74
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 3:
Line 3: − + + − + − + − + +
Essay:Rebuttal to Counterexamples to Relativity (view source)
Revision as of 00:49, January 25, 2012
, 00:49, January 25, 2012no edit summary
Unlike most essay pages, anyone is welcome to contribute. We ask that you abide by the usual guidelines—do not remove non-vandal, non-parody, non-libelous material without discussing it first on the talk page, or explaining after-the-fact for serious problems.
Unlike most essay pages, anyone is welcome to contribute. We ask that you abide by the usual guidelines—do not remove non-vandal, non-parody, non-libelous material without discussing it first on the talk page, or explaining after-the-fact for serious problems.
1:
1: ''Despite wasting millions of taxpayer dollars searching for gravity waves predicted by the theory, none has ever been found.Sound like global warming?''
:This is because the experimental capability to do so doesn't exist.
2:
2: ''The eccentricity of the Moon's orbit is increasing contrary to the theory of relativity''
:This could be a counterexample to both GR and Newtonian gravity--in both, the eccentricity is defined in terms of conserved quantities.
3:
3: ''Subatomic particles have a speed observed to be faster than the speed of light, which contradicts a fundamental assumption of Relativity.[4] The Italian lab that "shocked the scientific world" has announced more precise results, confirming their previous announcement''
:Saying this a bit prematurely, aren't you?
4:
4: