Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Talk:Examples of Bias in Wikipedia (view source)

Revision as of 04:14, January 8, 2007

564 bytes added ,  04:14, January 8, 2007
no edit summary
Line 67: Line 67:     
--[[User:BenjaminS|Ben]] 22:49, 7 January 2007 (EST)
 
--[[User:BenjaminS|Ben]] 22:49, 7 January 2007 (EST)
 +
 +
 +
:'''Reply:''' It is enough to observe that Wikipedia has no policy against gossip, other than a general (and relatively new but unenforced) policy against unverified claims.  Gossip is welcomed by Wikipedia and, as with the National Enquirer, helps boost popularity with the general public.
 +
 +
: In http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Seigenthaler_Sr._Wikipedia_biography_controversy
 +
: it was a hoax that created a backlash against Wikipedia.  But perhaps the real problem was how Wikipedia welcomes gossip.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 23:14, 7 January 2007 (EST)
Aschlafly
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,214

edits

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:MobileDiff/9568"

Navigation menu