1,023
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 20:
Line 20: + +
Talk:Examples of Bias in Wikipedia (view source)
Revision as of 06:18, January 8, 2007
, 06:18, January 8, 2007keep it
: '''REPLY'''OK, Tim, you win. Go ahead and erase the "Wackypedia" references as you like.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 15:23, 6 January 2007 (EST)
: '''REPLY'''OK, Tim, you win. Go ahead and erase the "Wackypedia" references as you like.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 15:23, 6 January 2007 (EST)
Don't give in yet Mr. Schlafly :) I vote to definitely keep it Wackypedia. Who are we trying to appeal to here? The biased editors on Wikipedia? No, the Conservative editors elsewhere. We believe Wikipedia is wacky. Why try to sound nice? Also, why did we move all the examples of Wikipeda bias to another page? That is our view of Wikipedia. When people visit our Wikipedia page, we want them to see this. Don't put it someplace else that someone may not see it. [[User:PhilipB|PhilipB]] 01:18, 8 January 2007 (EST)
==Gossip and vulgarity==
==Gossip and vulgarity==