Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 47: Line 47:     
:As to New Zealand, atheism is not nearly as high there as in European nations, including Britain. [http://www.adherents.com/largecom/com_atheist.html]  Also, fan conduct at a stadium is probably not a representative sample.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 00:38, 7 February 2012 (EST)
 
:As to New Zealand, atheism is not nearly as high there as in European nations, including Britain. [http://www.adherents.com/largecom/com_atheist.html]  Also, fan conduct at a stadium is probably not a representative sample.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 00:38, 7 February 2012 (EST)
 +
::On your first point, I would agree that there are many things that atheists and Christians will not see identically; however I don't know why support or otherwise for underdogs would be one of them.  In any case you have not offered any evidence that they see this particular thing differently - it appears you have simply assumed it.  I don't think it is inappropriate to ask for some form of positive evidence. 
 +
::Your next points, are valid, but they are only valid in a rebuttal sense.  They do nothing to provide support for your thesis that atheists and Christians differ in their support for underdogs.  I would say that as for NZ it has been 15 years since we have had a theist of any variety as Prime Minister (and standards have slipped markedly in that time!)
 +
::Let me approach this in a different way.  When did you first know that atheists don't support underdogs in the same way as Christians?  Was it in an article you read, or something someone told you?  Or was it something you realised for yourself after noticing a general trend?  Perhaps if we work out why you think its true we might be able to gather some evidence for it -positive or negative.  I have an open mind on this, but we do need to see some form of evidence.  --[[User:DamianJohn|DamianJohn]] 01:38, 7 February 2012 (EST)
Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit, rollback
907

edits

Navigation menu