Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 55: Line 55:  
::Let me approach this in a different way.  When did you first know that atheists don't support underdogs in the same way as Christians?  Was it in an article you read, or something someone told you?  Or was it something you realised for yourself after noticing a general trend?  Perhaps if we work out why you think its true we might be able to gather some evidence for it -positive or negative.  I have an open mind on this, but we do need to see some form of evidence.  --[[User:DamianJohn|DamianJohn]] 01:38, 7 February 2012 (EST)
 
::Let me approach this in a different way.  When did you first know that atheists don't support underdogs in the same way as Christians?  Was it in an article you read, or something someone told you?  Or was it something you realised for yourself after noticing a general trend?  Perhaps if we work out why you think its true we might be able to gather some evidence for it -positive or negative.  I have an open mind on this, but we do need to see some form of evidence.  --[[User:DamianJohn|DamianJohn]] 01:38, 7 February 2012 (EST)
 
:::Andy - fan conduct at a stadium is what brought this discussion about, is it not? You wrote this article to illustrate your own point about atheist fans at the Superbowl. Please tell me, how do we tell when "fan conduct is ... relative" and when it is not? [[User:Bobson|Bobson]] 07:56, 7 February 2012 (EST)
 
:::Andy - fan conduct at a stadium is what brought this discussion about, is it not? You wrote this article to illustrate your own point about atheist fans at the Superbowl. Please tell me, how do we tell when "fan conduct is ... relative" and when it is not? [[User:Bobson|Bobson]] 07:56, 7 February 2012 (EST)
 +
::They might not be as atheistic as the UK, but they are more atheistic than the USA, so it still contradicts your point that the more atheists there are, the less they root for the underdog. I'm still waiting for even a shred of evidence here. You state "The lack of cheering by atheists for the upset victory by the Giants in the Super Bowl...", I'm just wondering where you got your facts there. Do you observe it yourself? How could you know who was an atheist and who wasn't? Did you read some statistic somewhere? Where? So far it appears you're using a circular argument: atheists didn't rot for the underdog. How do i know this? Atheists never root for the underdog. Evidence? Well, look at the Super Bowl! Also, keep in mind the Giants weren't even much of an underdog, the Patriots were favored only by about 3 points. They were the real underdog 4 years ago. If you really wanted to make your point here, you should have gone with Tebow, as he was a real underdog who a lot of Christians rooted for. He's still one atypical example, and the reason a lot people who didn't like him is because they thought he was overhyped, getting much more attention than many better players, some even on his own team. He really isn't a very good quarterback, at least not yet. [[User:DaveE|DaveE]] 10:05, 7 February 2012 (EST)
    
== Is this serious? ==
 
== Is this serious? ==
15

edits

Navigation menu