13
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 148:
Line 148: + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Talk:Mystery:Why Do Atheists Dislike Underdogs? (view source)
Revision as of 20:48, February 8, 2012
, 20:48, February 8, 2012→Atheists and surprises
Conservapedia guideline about attribution: ''There's a difference between stating flatly that "the earth is 6,000 years old" and reporting that "Young Earth creationists say that the earth is 6,000 years old." […] Simply by attributing a statement to the person who said it, we can turn bias into fact. That is, we convert a statement about something from a biased assertion into an attribution. We don't say "X". We say that "A said X." […] Thus, a good article "describes" - it does not "prescribe".'' [[User:Baobab|Baobab]] 09:18, 8 February 2012 (EST)
Conservapedia guideline about attribution: ''There's a difference between stating flatly that "the earth is 6,000 years old" and reporting that "Young Earth creationists say that the earth is 6,000 years old." […] Simply by attributing a statement to the person who said it, we can turn bias into fact. That is, we convert a statement about something from a biased assertion into an attribution. We don't say "X". We say that "A said X." […] Thus, a good article "describes" - it does not "prescribe".'' [[User:Baobab|Baobab]] 09:18, 8 February 2012 (EST)
== Hey Conserapedos – Lay off Andy! ==
We liberal atheists love conservapedia for its entertainment value – and Andy’s latest ‘mystery’ article ranks alongside Ken’s hilarious confused ramblings.
So leave him alone – don’t spoil this wonderful site. The last thing we want is this website to have any credibility!
And remember - conservatives are less intelligent than liberals.
www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2095549/Right-wingers-intelligent-left-wingers-says-controversial-study--conservative-politics-lead-people-racist.html
Sorry guys….
<references/>
<references/>