Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
2,349 bytes removed ,  20:54, February 8, 2012
Undo revision 959750 by DianaD (talk)
Line 40: Line 40:  
== vandal rash ==
 
== vandal rash ==
   −
== Hey Conserapedos – Lay off Andy! ==
+
Recentchanges is filled with vandals. Can we do a checkuser? --[[User:JonM|JonM]] 23:44, 10 January 2012 (EST)
 +
:Hi Jon, I do not have access to the checkUser, you may want to check this list: [http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special%3AListUsers&username=&group=checkuser&limit=50]. --[[User:PhilipN|PhilipN]] 23:49, 10 January 2012 (EST)
   −
We liberal atheists love conservapedia for its entertainment value – and Andy’s latest ‘mystery’ article ranks alongside Ken’s hilarious confused ramblings.
  −
  −
So leave him alone – don’t spoil this wonderful site. The last thing we want is this website to have any credibility!
  −
  −
And remember - conservatives are less intelligent than liberals.
  −
  −
www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2095549/Right-wingers-intelligent-left-wingers-says-controversial-study--conservative-politics-lead-people-racist.html
  −
  −
Sorry guys…. 
  −
  −
  −
  −
Recentchanges is filled with vandals.
  −
  −
== Hey Conserapedos – Lay off Andy! ==
  −
  −
We liberal atheists love conservapedia for its entertainment value – and Andy’s latest ‘mystery’ article ranks alongside Ken’s hilarious confused ramblings.
  −
  −
So leave him alone – don’t spoil this wonderful site. The last thing we want is this website to have any credibility!
  −
  −
And remember - conservatives are less intelligent than liberals.
  −
  −
www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2095549/Right-wingers-intelligent-left-wingers-says-controversial-study--conservative-politics-lead-people-racist.html
  −
  −
Sorry guys…. 
  −
  −
  −
  −
Can we do a checkuser? --[[User:JonM|JonM]] 23:44, 10 January 2012 (EST)
  −
:Hi Jon, I do not have access to the checkUser, you may want to check this list: [http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special%3AListUsers&username=%26amp%3Bgroup%3Dcheckuser%26amp%3Blimit%3D50]%2E --[[User:PhilipN|PhilipN]] 23:49, 10 January 2012 (EST)
  −
  −
  −
== Hey Conserapedos – Lay off Andy! ==
  −
  −
We liberal atheists love conservapedia for its entertainment value – and Andy’s latest ‘mystery’ article ranks alongside Ken’s hilarious confused ramblings.
  −
  −
So leave him alone – don’t spoil this wonderful site. The last thing we want is this website to have any credibility!
  −
  −
And remember - conservatives are less intelligent than liberals.
  −
  −
www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2095549/Right-wingers-intelligent-left-wingers-says-controversial-study--conservative-politics-lead-people-racist.html
  −
  −
Sorry guys…. 
  −
  −
  −
== Hey Conserapedos – Lay off Andy! ==
  −
  −
We liberal atheists love conservapedia for its entertainment value – and Andy’s latest ‘mystery’ article ranks alongside Ken’s hilarious confused ramblings.
  −
  −
So leave him alone – don’t spoil this wonderful site. The last thing we want is this website to have any credibility!
  −
  −
And remember - conservatives are less intelligent than liberals.
  −
  −
www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2095549/Right-wingers-intelligent-left-wingers-says-controversial-study--conservative-politics-lead-people-racist.html
  −
  −
Sorry guys…. 
      
== World Heritage Sites ==
 
== World Heritage Sites ==
 
: Fine, thank you! --[[User:Joaquín Martínez|Joaquín Martínez]] 09:40, 24 January 2012 (EST)
 
: Fine, thank you! --[[User:Joaquín Martínez|Joaquín Martínez]] 09:40, 24 January 2012 (EST)
126

edits

Navigation menu