Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 216: Line 216:  
::I believe you forgot the "ir" before relevant. As far as I am concerned, this has nothing to do with the discussed matter... There is no more reason to say that religion is the reason why Uk has worse social mobility than the US than to say that religion is the reason why Sweden has better social mobility than the US. --[[User:PhilipN|PhilipN]] 19:16, 8 February 2012 (EST)
 
::I believe you forgot the "ir" before relevant. As far as I am concerned, this has nothing to do with the discussed matter... There is no more reason to say that religion is the reason why Uk has worse social mobility than the US than to say that religion is the reason why Sweden has better social mobility than the US. --[[User:PhilipN|PhilipN]] 19:16, 8 February 2012 (EST)
 
:::PhilipN, you can continue to assert that religion and religious cultural legacies do not affect social mobility and other societal behaviors, but you have failed to provide data to support this notion. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 19:58, 8 February 2012 (EST)
 
:::PhilipN, you can continue to assert that religion and religious cultural legacies do not affect social mobility and other societal behaviors, but you have failed to provide data to support this notion. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 19:58, 8 February 2012 (EST)
 +
:::User: BaileyJ, I realize that liberals are often allergic to data and the real world, nevertheless Britain having a history of societal stratification and even recently and irresponsible liberal programs creating dependency and less social mobility is still real. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 20:03, 8 February 2012 (EST)
    
== Atheists and surprises ==
 
== Atheists and surprises ==
Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
350,920

edits

Navigation menu