Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit, rollback
1,825
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 224:
Line 224: + +
Talk:Mystery:Why Do Atheists Dislike Underdogs? (view source)
Revision as of 05:19, February 9, 2012
, 05:19, February 9, 2012You are missing my point, Conservative. Maybe it was another person before ;)
::::--[[User:PhilipN|PhilipN]] 22:59, 8 February 2012 (EST)
::::--[[User:PhilipN|PhilipN]] 22:59, 8 February 2012 (EST)
:::::Philip, my main point in this section was the UK has poor social mobility and I have provided more than enough evidence that they have a history of this. I gave some statistics above which helps explain the US and social mobility and said there is a difference between equality of opportunity vs. achieving equal results (we do live in a multi-variable world). I also commented already on Denmark/Sweden. Lastly, since you seem to not want to address my points, I see it pointless to continue with you here. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 00:07, 9 February 2012 (EST)
:::::Philip, my main point in this section was the UK has poor social mobility and I have provided more than enough evidence that they have a history of this. I gave some statistics above which helps explain the US and social mobility and said there is a difference between equality of opportunity vs. achieving equal results (we do live in a multi-variable world). I also commented already on Denmark/Sweden. Lastly, since you seem to not want to address my points, I see it pointless to continue with you here. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 00:07, 9 February 2012 (EST)
::::::Conservative, I do want to address your points but those are not always clear to me. I do agree with you on the fact that the UK has poor social mobility and that the US have a better social mobility than the UK and I really do agree that we live in a multi-variable world and that is exactly my point. I do not agree with your linking the social opportunities with religion and I believe I have provided more than enough evidence that those are not related.--[[User:PhilipN|PhilipN]] 00:19, 9 February 2012 (EST)
::::::User: BaileyJ, I realize that liberals are often allergic to data and the real world, nevertheless Britain having a history of societal stratification compared to many Western nations is still real. In addition, irresponsible centrally controlled social programs creating dependency and less social mobility is also still real. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 20:03, 8 February 2012 (EST)
::::::User: BaileyJ, I realize that liberals are often allergic to data and the real world, nevertheless Britain having a history of societal stratification compared to many Western nations is still real. In addition, irresponsible centrally controlled social programs creating dependency and less social mobility is also still real. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 20:03, 8 February 2012 (EST)