Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 108: Line 108:     
== UK has worse social mobility than most other developed countries plus ungodly UK citizens and poodles and other underdogs ==
 
== UK has worse social mobility than most other developed countries plus ungodly UK citizens and poodles and other underdogs ==
−
  −
  −
Look chaps, there's 2 different issues going on here. I'm a Brit (atheist and liberal) but Andy is actually right on one point - social mobility is terrible in our country. However, he couldn't be more wrong about the 'underdog' issue. We stood up to the ultimate evil empire - the Nazis - We needed our 'cousins' help for which we are eternally grateful. But for a long time, we were alone...
  −
  −
  −
[[User:EJamesW|EJamesW]] 18:21, 10 February 2012 (EST)
  −
      
UK has worse social mobility than most other developed countries - including the United States. [http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2010/mar/10/oecd-uk-worst-social-mobility] It would seem being an underdog in the UK is more difficult than in many other developed nations. [[Social Darwinism]] started in Britain too. Plus, ungodly UK citizens and poodles and other underdogs: [[Bestiality and Britain]] [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 20:48, 7 February 2012 (EST)
 
UK has worse social mobility than most other developed countries - including the United States. [http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2010/mar/10/oecd-uk-worst-social-mobility] It would seem being an underdog in the UK is more difficult than in many other developed nations. [[Social Darwinism]] started in Britain too. Plus, ungodly UK citizens and poodles and other underdogs: [[Bestiality and Britain]] [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 20:48, 7 February 2012 (EST)
Line 259: Line 252:  
:::Davidspencer, there is a difference between the origination of something and when it "takes off" (becomes popular).  Punks rock (wearing spiked mohawks, green hair, etc. etc.) never was all that popular from a Western Civilization perspective and so I think it is fair to say that punk didn't really "take off" until its latter stages. So I don't believe I was incorrect in my statement. Lastly, I really don't care much about punk rock or discussing it, so I don't see our punk rock discussion continuing very long. 17:30, 10 February 2012 (EST)
 
:::Davidspencer, there is a difference between the origination of something and when it "takes off" (becomes popular).  Punks rock (wearing spiked mohawks, green hair, etc. etc.) never was all that popular from a Western Civilization perspective and so I think it is fair to say that punk didn't really "take off" until its latter stages. So I don't believe I was incorrect in my statement. Lastly, I really don't care much about punk rock or discussing it, so I don't see our punk rock discussion continuing very long. 17:30, 10 February 2012 (EST)
 
Rafael, thanks for the correction. I very much enjoy watching the British politician Nigel Farage from time to time. He is an opponent of the Eurozone as you may be aware. He publicly harangues  the pompous and incompetent Eurozone bureaucrats in a very humorous way. Given the commotion that Nigel Farage raises, I assumed the wrong thing about Britain and Eurozone. Also, I believe someone has discussed Sweden, Denmark, Norway and these countries did have a more favorable government debt to GDP ratio than Britain in 2010. Lastly, I think we will have to agree to disagree on the degree that religion affects economics but I do think I showed causality [http://conservapedia.com/Talk:Main_Page#.22Clearly.2C_the_.22secular.22_in_secular_Europe_is_not_working_out_well_in_many_countries.22 HERE] among other places on this wiki. You may want to review the resources [http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2011/oct/31/economics-religion-research HERE] and [http://www.ldolphin.org/bumbulis/ HERE] and [[Christianity and science|HERE]] (the historian Ferdinand Braudel points out that technology often has a more dramatic effect on history and economics than political leaders and other signficant people in history). Even the Harvard opponents of [[Max Weber]]'s ideas about the Protestant work ethic concede that Protestantism led to higher literacy rates and therefore higher economic productivity as can be seen [http://www.hks.harvard.edu/pepg/PDF/Papers/PEPG07-04_Becker_Woessmann.pdf HERE].  Lastly, my discussions with people in poor countries has led me to believe that often it is just a matter of blooming where you are planted. For example, I know someone in [[Mali]] (one of the poorest countries of Africa)  who had some drive and he was able to be successful through hard work and study. I spoke to someone in Bangledesh who gave similar testimony about being economically successful in his country. [[Joseph]] is a great example of someone who didn't let circumstances get him down and with divine favor he eventually surpassed his brothers in terms of his station in life. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 17:30, 10 February 2012 (EST)
 
Rafael, thanks for the correction. I very much enjoy watching the British politician Nigel Farage from time to time. He is an opponent of the Eurozone as you may be aware. He publicly harangues  the pompous and incompetent Eurozone bureaucrats in a very humorous way. Given the commotion that Nigel Farage raises, I assumed the wrong thing about Britain and Eurozone. Also, I believe someone has discussed Sweden, Denmark, Norway and these countries did have a more favorable government debt to GDP ratio than Britain in 2010. Lastly, I think we will have to agree to disagree on the degree that religion affects economics but I do think I showed causality [http://conservapedia.com/Talk:Main_Page#.22Clearly.2C_the_.22secular.22_in_secular_Europe_is_not_working_out_well_in_many_countries.22 HERE] among other places on this wiki. You may want to review the resources [http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2011/oct/31/economics-religion-research HERE] and [http://www.ldolphin.org/bumbulis/ HERE] and [[Christianity and science|HERE]] (the historian Ferdinand Braudel points out that technology often has a more dramatic effect on history and economics than political leaders and other signficant people in history). Even the Harvard opponents of [[Max Weber]]'s ideas about the Protestant work ethic concede that Protestantism led to higher literacy rates and therefore higher economic productivity as can be seen [http://www.hks.harvard.edu/pepg/PDF/Papers/PEPG07-04_Becker_Woessmann.pdf HERE].  Lastly, my discussions with people in poor countries has led me to believe that often it is just a matter of blooming where you are planted. For example, I know someone in [[Mali]] (one of the poorest countries of Africa)  who had some drive and he was able to be successful through hard work and study. I spoke to someone in Bangledesh who gave similar testimony about being economically successful in his country. [[Joseph]] is a great example of someone who didn't let circumstances get him down and with divine favor he eventually surpassed his brothers in terms of his station in life. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 17:30, 10 February 2012 (EST)
 +
Look chaps, there's 2 different issues going on here. I'm a Brit (atheist and liberal) but Andy is actually right on one point - social mobility is terrible in our country. However, he couldn't be more wrong about the 'underdog' issue. We stood up to the ultimate evil empire - the Nazis - We needed our 'cousins' help for which we are eternally grateful. But for a long time, we were alone...
 +
[[User:EJamesW|EJamesW]] 18:21, 10 February 2012 (EST)
 +
:::EJamesW, I was the one who first brought up Britian social mobility. Andy subsequently incorporated that into his essay. :) Also, I do think that social mobility and rooting for underdogs must have some correlation. How can a society which claims to be ardently for underdogs have low social mobility due to social stratification and unnecessary impediments. It's a contradiction. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 18:33, 10 February 2012 (EST)
    
== Atheists and surprises ==
 
== Atheists and surprises ==
Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,636

edits

Navigation menu