1
edit
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 2:
Line 2: + +
no edit summary
: The group claims to be pro-women in addition to being pro-life, and omitting praise for the homemaker is a glaring slight to women. It reflects a different agenda by the group than one might expect.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 13:20, 9 August 2008 (EDT)
: The group claims to be pro-women in addition to being pro-life, and omitting praise for the homemaker is a glaring slight to women. It reflects a different agenda by the group than one might expect.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 13:20, 9 August 2008 (EDT)
:: Different than one might expect...based on their use of the term "feminists"? On the contrary, I'd hardly expect a group of self-described feminists to be taking time off from their main message (in this case, the message that abortion is bad) to diverge on tangents promoting homemaking. Maybe your ideal ''preference'' is that any website anticipating a female audience devote itself primarily to extolling the virtues of homemaking, but a pie-in-the-sky fantasy and a reasonable ''expectation'' are very different. He's right -- this is totally irrelevant.