Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit, rollback
6,613
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 61:
Line 61: + +
→"Weak Agnosticism" and "Strong Agnosticism"?: interesting
Is there a difference between people who are clearly religious and "think" there is a God, and live as if there is one, but admit they don't "know" if there is one, and agnostics who have the reverse idea - they doubt God exists, but feel they have no way of disproving it? And of course, those agnostics who are in the middle somewhere? Are they all the same category? [[User:Gregkochuconn|Gregkochuconn]] 08:43, 8 March 2012 (EST)
Is there a difference between people who are clearly religious and "think" there is a God, and live as if there is one, but admit they don't "know" if there is one, and agnostics who have the reverse idea - they doubt God exists, but feel they have no way of disproving it? And of course, those agnostics who are in the middle somewhere? Are they all the same category? [[User:Gregkochuconn|Gregkochuconn]] 08:43, 8 March 2012 (EST)
:This is interesting. Certainly, Richard Dawkins's brand of agnosticism, which involves arguing vociferously against the existence of God, seems very different from what a lot of people would understand by agnosticism - a kind of fence-sitting. I might call RiDaw's (apparent) beliefs "atheism with a footnote" rather than agnosticism.--[[User:CPalmer|CPalmer]] 09:17, 8 March 2012 (EST)