Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
752
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 63:
Line 63: +
→"Weak Agnosticism" and "Strong Agnosticism"?
:This is interesting. Certainly, Richard Dawkins's brand of agnosticism, which involves arguing vociferously against the existence of God, seems very different from what a lot of people would understand by agnosticism - a kind of fence-sitting. I might call RiDaw's (apparent) beliefs "atheism with a footnote" rather than agnosticism.--[[User:CPalmer|CPalmer]] 09:17, 8 March 2012 (EST)
:This is interesting. Certainly, Richard Dawkins's brand of agnosticism, which involves arguing vociferously against the existence of God, seems very different from what a lot of people would understand by agnosticism - a kind of fence-sitting. I might call RiDaw's (apparent) beliefs "atheism with a footnote" rather than agnosticism.--[[User:CPalmer|CPalmer]] 09:17, 8 March 2012 (EST)
:: And what about the "opposite" of Dawkins - people who think there is a God, act as if there is a God, but feel you can't empirically prove there is a God? If Dawkins is agnostic, so are they, technically. [[User:Gregkochuconn|Gregkochuconn]] 11:54, 14 March 2012 (EDT)