Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
578 bytes added ,  23:20, March 14, 2012
intro sentence is wrong
Line 1: Line 1:  
This seems an awful lot like an unproven, accusatory conspiracy theory--similar to the 9/11 attacks. I can guarantee that, even if the Democratic Party did something like this, they wouldn't have given it your nickname of the "War on Women". {{unsigned|User:JLefkowitz}}
 
This seems an awful lot like an unproven, accusatory conspiracy theory--similar to the 9/11 attacks. I can guarantee that, even if the Democratic Party did something like this, they wouldn't have given it your nickname of the "War on Women". {{unsigned|User:JLefkowitz}}
 
:Yes, a conspiracy theory. I knew the Democrats were incapable of playing political cards.--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 16:34, 13 March 2012 (EDT)
 
:Yes, a conspiracy theory. I knew the Democrats were incapable of playing political cards.--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 16:34, 13 March 2012 (EDT)
 +
== Intro sentence wrong ==
 +
The article starts with "''"War on Women" is a campaign narrative crafted and promoted by the Democratic Party for the 2012 election cycle.''" The term predates the current election cycle. As far as I can tell Democrats have been using the term for the last 5-6 years. They use the phrase every time the GOP makes an effort to curtail legal abortions, resist democratic proposals for increased contraception funding, or attempt to defund groups like Planned Parenthood. It's not a new phenomenon. --[[User:JoshuaB|JoshuaB]] 19:20, 14 March 2012 (EDT)
181

edits

Navigation menu