Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,794
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 22:
Line 22: + +
Talk:Law of Large Numbers (view source)
Revision as of 14:58, March 18, 2012
, 14:58, March 18, 2012→The Law of Large Numbers is a Counterexample to the Theory of Evolution: OK, fine: the other Darwinists who relied on random genetic drift (presumably to try to fit the evidence to Darwin's
::Genetic Drift wasn't described until the mid-1900s. How can Darwin have been reliant on it when proposing his theory? --[[User:RedGoliath|RedGoliath]] 11:58, 18 March 2012 (GMT)
::Genetic Drift wasn't described until the mid-1900s. How can Darwin have been reliant on it when proposing his theory? --[[User:RedGoliath|RedGoliath]] 11:58, 18 March 2012 (GMT)
:::OK, fine: the other [[Darwinists]] who relied on random genetic drift (presumably to try to fit the evidence to Darwin's theory) "were weak in [[mathematics]] and [[probability]], and their reliance on random genetic drift is nonsensical as illustrated by the [[Law of Large Numbers]]."--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 10:58, 18 March 2012 (EDT)