278
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 24:
Line 24: +
Talk:Law of Large Numbers (view source)
Revision as of 18:06, March 18, 2012
, 18:06, March 18, 2012→The Law of Large Numbers is a Counterexample to the Theory of Evolution
:::OK, fine: the other [[Darwinists]] who relied on random genetic drift (presumably to try to fit the evidence to Darwin's theory) "were weak in [[mathematics]] and [[probability]], and their reliance on random genetic drift is nonsensical as illustrated by the [[Law of Large Numbers]]."--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 10:58, 18 March 2012 (EDT)
:::OK, fine: the other [[Darwinists]] who relied on random genetic drift (presumably to try to fit the evidence to Darwin's theory) "were weak in [[mathematics]] and [[probability]], and their reliance on random genetic drift is nonsensical as illustrated by the [[Law of Large Numbers]]."--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 10:58, 18 March 2012 (EDT)
::::Andy, please consider teaching a course on mathematics and probability (or science in general), explaining systematically and in detail where lame-stream science goes wrong. I admit that I am confused right now, having been indoctrinated by liberal science classes all my life, and would enroll immediately. We need the arguments to fight Darwinism effectively! Think about how we, your students, could act as multipliers! I am sure that you would do much better than the Question Evolution campaign, which I admit I am not a fan of. --[[User:FrederickT3|FrederickT3]] 14:06, 18 March 2012 (EDT)