Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,794
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 25:
Line 25: + +
Talk:Law of Large Numbers (view source)
Revision as of 19:03, March 18, 2012
, 19:03, March 18, 2012→The Law of Large Numbers is a Counterexample to the Theory of Evolution: He then passed the book out to his fellow scientists at work, and it opened their eyes to all the lies they had been
:::OK, fine: the other [[Darwinists]] who relied on random genetic drift (presumably to try to fit the evidence to Darwin's theory) "were weak in [[mathematics]] and [[probability]], and their reliance on random genetic drift is nonsensical as illustrated by the [[Law of Large Numbers]]."--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 10:58, 18 March 2012 (EDT)
:::OK, fine: the other [[Darwinists]] who relied on random genetic drift (presumably to try to fit the evidence to Darwin's theory) "were weak in [[mathematics]] and [[probability]], and their reliance on random genetic drift is nonsensical as illustrated by the [[Law of Large Numbers]]."--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 10:58, 18 March 2012 (EDT)
::::Andy, please consider teaching a course on mathematics and probability (or science in general), explaining systematically and in detail where lame-stream science goes wrong. I admit that I am confused right now, having been indoctrinated by liberal science classes all my life, and would enroll immediately. We need the arguments to fight Darwinism effectively! Think about how we, your students, could act as multipliers! I am sure that you would do much better than the Question Evolution campaign, which I admit I am not a fan of. --[[User:FrederickT3|FrederickT3]] 14:06, 18 March 2012 (EDT)
::::Andy, please consider teaching a course on mathematics and probability (or science in general), explaining systematically and in detail where lame-stream science goes wrong. I admit that I am confused right now, having been indoctrinated by liberal science classes all my life, and would enroll immediately. We need the arguments to fight Darwinism effectively! Think about how we, your students, could act as multipliers! I am sure that you would do much better than the Question Evolution campaign, which I admit I am not a fan of. --[[User:FrederickT3|FrederickT3]] 14:06, 18 March 2012 (EDT)
:::::When I did teach (offline) a science class and pointed out the many flaws in the [[theory of evolution]], one family asked me for additional copies of an inexpensive course book entitled "Evolution Cruncher." He then passed the book out to his fellow scientists at work, and it opened their eyes to all the lies they had been taught in school. There were astounded ... and grateful. My own experience in waking up to the lies taught to me in school was similar.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 15:03, 18 March 2012 (EDT)