89
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 27:
Line 27: + + + +
Talk:Law of Large Numbers (view source)
Revision as of 23:40, March 18, 2012
, 23:40, March 18, 2012reply to Aschafly.
:::::When I did teach (offline) a science class and pointed out the many flaws in the [[theory of evolution]], one family asked me for additional copies of an inexpensive course book entitled "Evolution Cruncher." He then passed the book out to his fellow scientists at work, and it opened their eyes to all the lies they had been taught in school. There were astounded ... and grateful. My own experience in waking up to the lies taught to me in school was similar.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 15:03, 18 March 2012 (EDT)
:::::When I did teach (offline) a science class and pointed out the many flaws in the [[theory of evolution]], one family asked me for additional copies of an inexpensive course book entitled "Evolution Cruncher." He then passed the book out to his fellow scientists at work, and it opened their eyes to all the lies they had been taught in school. There were astounded ... and grateful. My own experience in waking up to the lies taught to me in school was similar.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 15:03, 18 March 2012 (EDT)
::"Children of extraordinarly bright or athletic parents are, on average, not so extraordinary." Yes. But I think that they are on average better than children of very weak people. And this is enough to show that properties of children and their parents are not independent. If they were independent, a child of two athletes would have the same distribution as child of two physically feeble people. As another example, genetic diseases exist, and a child of ill parents has larger chances to be ill as well.
Do you accept microevolution? I think your interpretation of law of large numbers disproves also microevolution. Regards, --[[User:Cipe|Cipe]] 19:40, 18 March 2012 (EDT)