10
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: − ''Conservapedia'' is in a unique position to rank other information sources of all types. Please see our nominations below the table, and fill in others as you like. − {| class="wikitable" − |- − !Rank − !Information Source − !Comments − |- − |1 − |[http://www.cnsnews.com/home Cybercast News] − |uniquely informative news across all issues, including social ones; a top-quality news site in every respect − |- − |2 − |[http://www.wnd.com/ WorldNetDaily] − |has reporters at conservative events; moved to number 1 with its candid and courageous reporting about the [[homosexual agenda]]; has also had excellent reporting on the [[Obama]] birth certificate issue − |- − |3 − |[http://patriotupdate.com Patriot Update] − |Founded in 2009, [[Patriot Update]] is a leading [[conservative]] news source for the everyday American. − |- − |4 − |[http://newsbusters.org/ Newsbusters] − |insightful, original, and good across all issues; exposes liberal deceit well − |- − |5 − |[http://www.lifesitenews.com/ LifeSiteNews] − |terrific focus on [[pro-life]] and other moral issues; savvy and original ... and doesn't suffer fools lightly − |- − |6 − |[http://www.breitbart.com/ Breitbart] − |breaks some big stories and exposes [[liberal deceit]] well − |- − |7 − |[http://www.onenewsnow.com OneNewsNow] − |a division of the American Family News Network, reporting on general news with liberal selection bias − |- − |8 − |[http://www.lifenews.com/ Lifenews] − |has lots of [[abortion]]-related stories, and prioritizes them well, but is not critical enough of politicians who pretend to be pro-life − |- − |9 − |[http://hotair.com/ Hotair] − |typically links to other stories, often with a [[neoconservative]] emphasis rather than socially conservative − |- − |10 − |[http://www.redstate.com/ RedState] − |timely and good volume, with focus on economic, government and election issues − |- − |11 − |''[[Washington Times]]'' − |a conservative news source from the nation's capital − |- − |12 − |''[[Fox News]]'' − |high volume of info, but censors many [[conservative]]s<ref>Conservatives censored (or disparaged) by Fox News include [[Ron Paul]], [[Rand Paul]], [[Pat Buchanan]], Tom Pauken, Rev. Tom Euteneuer, [[Michael Steele]], [[J.D. Hayworth]], [[Steve Lonegan]] and [[Tom Coburn]]; [[Sharron Angle]] has been rarely on Fox News, far less than [[John McCain]] was, even though Angle's race is far more important than McCain's.</ref> and downplays the social issues (for example, see: [[Fox News and homosexuality]]) − |- − |13 − |''[[Christian Science Monitor]]'' − |refreshing in its lack of [[lamestream media]] liberal bias − |- − |14 − |''[[USA Today]]'' − |better than the [[lamestream media]] in its reporting on state-by-state news, and its greater balance; but it has been very [[feminist]] and one-sided in its reporting on [[Title IX]] in college sports − |- − |15 − |''Orange County Register'' − |the newspaper for the region that once propelled [[Ronald Reagan]] to become the governor of [[California]], and then the [[President]] of the [[United States]] − |- − |16 − |''Financial Times'' − |more conservative than the [[Wall Street Journal]] − |- − |17 − |''Voice of America'' − |worth reading from time to time − |- − |18 − |[http://www.conservativenewsandviews.com Conservative News and Views] − |relatively new, covers a variety of conservative issues but mostly politics − |- − |19 − |[http://www.examiner.com/creationism-in-national/terry-hurlbut Terry Hurlbut] − |CP administrator Terry Hurlbut at the Examiner − |- − |20 − |''The Hill'' − |terrific source of news from Washington, D.C., without [[liberal bias]] − |- − |21 − |[http://www.prolifeblogs.com/ Pro-life blogs] − |a good compendium of blogging on the pro-life issue − |- − |22 − |[http://1461days.blogspot.com/ the 1461] − |following the Obama Administrations use and Abuse of the Executive Order and more − |- − |22 − |Junkscience − |exposing the [[global warming]] hoax and other liberal falsehoods masquerading as science − |-} − − == Nominations == − − Tentative placement (high ranking, medium ranking, low ranking) in parentheses, suggestions welcome: − − *americanthinker.com (medium-to-low, not much on social issues) − *biggovernment.com − *bighollywood.com − *bigjournalism.com − *bigpeace.com − *[http://www.boycottliberalism.com/ BoycottLiberalism.com] Don't Buy Liberalism − *breitbart.com (low, much of it repeating liberal news sources; political coverage dominated by foreign policy issues) − *breitbart.tv − *canadafreepress.com − *catholicedition.com (has lots of quantity not allowed by [[lamestream media]]) − *climateaudit.org (medium, but high quality on global warming issues) − *cnsnews.com (high, especially for news censored by [[lamestream media]], but it does not update news as frequently as other top sites) − *[http://www.the-manumitter.com/ The Daily Manumitter]- Conservative News of the world on one page − *examiner.com (high) − *[[Fox News]] (low, but high volume) − *[http://www.thegatewaypundit.com GatewayPundit] − *[http://www.youtube.com/user/GeraldCelenteChannel Gerald Celente YouTube channel] (respects US Constitution, anti-[[Federal Reserve]], limited government, against bailouts and stimulus, pro-capitalism, predicted [[Tea Party Movement]] and the Great Recession, against USA being entangled in wars capriciously) − *frontpagemag.com − *hotair.com (medium) − *humanevents.com − *intellectualconservative.com − *lifenews.com (high quality, high volume; reports on social issues better than anyone) − *mediaite.com − *michellemalkin.com (high or medium) − *moonbattery.com − *[[NewsBusters]] (medium) − *newsmax.com (medium) − *pajamasmedia.com − *politico.com (medium) − *politicsdaily.com − *rasmussenreports.com (high or medium, but high quality poll statistics) − *redstate.com (medium) − *rightwingnews.com (low due to crass and vulgar style) − *rushlimbaugh.com (medium or low, but high volume/quality conservative radio transcripts) − *sepp.org (medium, but high quality on global warming issues) − *spectator.com − *thedailycaller.com − *[[thehill.com]] − *Wall Street Journal − *Weekly Standard − *[http://www.newswithviews.com/ News With Views] − − Other sources: − − *Realclearpolitics (detailed polling about upcoming congressional elections) − − == Criteria == − − *substantive − *educational − *includes social issues − *does not play favorites among individuals − *does not waste time and energy on [[gossip]] − *factual accuracy<ref>"Factual accuracy," per [[Conservapedia|Conservapedia's]] [[Conservapedia:Manual_of_Style#Citing_Sources_and_Using_Footnotes|Manual of Style]]: ''"The party affiliation of a news source should be irrelevant. All that matters is whether the source has a record of telling the truth."''</ref> − *does not rely on offensive, non-family-friendly material to boost traffic − *informs as well as attracting interest − *original content − − (add more) − == See also == − − − * [[Conservative links]] and [[Conservative resources]] − − * [[Conservative video]] − − * [[Conservative columnists]] − − * [[Conservative blogs]] − − * [[Major conservative organizations]] − − * [[Conservative humor and satire resources]] − − == References == − <references/> − − [[Category:Essays]][[Category:Lists]]
Top Conservative news websites (view source)
Revision as of 12:07, March 23, 2012
, 12:07, March 23, 2012no edit summary