| Line 3: |
Line 3: |
| | # No matter what happens in the weather, [[global warming]] must have caused it | | # No matter what happens in the weather, [[global warming]] must have caused it |
| | # Insist on "tolerance" for anything that is anti-[[Christian]], while promoting [[censorship]] for anything which is [[Christian]] | | # Insist on "tolerance" for anything that is anti-[[Christian]], while promoting [[censorship]] for anything which is [[Christian]] |
| | + | # If a crime is committed against a member of a predominantly [[Democrat]]ic group, then it's a [[hate crime]]; if committed against a member of a mostly [[Republican]] group, then it is not |
| | # Claim something is true merely because a (nearly bankrupt) newspaper said so (see [[appeal to authority]]) | | # Claim something is true merely because a (nearly bankrupt) newspaper said so (see [[appeal to authority]]) |
| | # Claim that liberals' viewpoints are being censored, while actually they are the ones censoring their opponents | | # Claim that liberals' viewpoints are being censored, while actually they are the ones censoring their opponents |
| | # Claim that switching from heterosexual to [[homosexual]] is customary, but switching back is somehow impossible | | # Claim that switching from heterosexual to [[homosexual]] is customary, but switching back is somehow impossible |
| − | #Insist that someone needs to experience something (e.g., drugs, pornography, gambling, etc.) before being able to criticize it<ref>[http://serendip.brynmawr.edu/exchange/node/1808 Bryn Mawr report on marijuana]. Many commentators said the reporter had no justification for his views since he had never tried marijuana. Examples of such liberal logic included: "There are pros and cons to everything under the sun. That dosen't (sic) mean that you shouldn't try it all...Besides marijuana is so much more beneficial then everyone realizes." which was smartly replied to by another commenter with: "Following your logic, obviously there are PROS to: | + | # Insist that someone needs to experience something (e.g., drugs, pornography, gambling, etc.) before being able to criticize it<ref>[http://serendip.brynmawr.edu/exchange/node/1808 Bryn Mawr report on marijuana]. Many commentators said the reporter had no justification for his views since he had never tried marijuana. Examples of such liberal logic included: "There are pros and cons to everything under the sun. That dosen't (sic) mean that you shouldn't try it all...Besides marijuana is so much more beneficial then everyone realizes." which was smartly replied to by another commenter with: "Following your logic, obviously there are PROS to: |
| | *jumping off the Empire State Building | | *jumping off the Empire State Building |
| | *anorexia | | *anorexia |