Changes

There are liberals/atheists/evolutionists who are greatly puzzled that I am capable of showing an inexplicable amount of clarity in areas of outside atheism/evolutionism. I will now solve this puzzle without Occam's razor being violated (Let's not forget the fact that William of Ockham was a theist). Atheism and the evolutionary paradigm are false.  

There are liberals/atheists/evolutionists who are greatly puzzled that I am capable of showing an inexplicable amount of clarity in areas of outside atheism/evolutionism. I will now solve this puzzle without Occam's razor being violated (Let's not forget the fact that William of Ockham was a theist). Atheism and the evolutionary paradigm are false.  

Do you see the sheer beauty of this simple, yet powerful solution? It elegantly explains why evolutionism violates the tenets of open science, does it not? Namely, evolutionism displays these characteristics: evolutionists have  [http://creation.com/that-quote-about-the-missing-transitional-fossils "trade secrets"] that they attempt to keep from the public and evolutionists futilely [http://usstore.creation.com/catalog/slaughter-dissidents-p-963.html?osCsid=de3u859284nnchqbskrigeuaf4 attempting to crush dissent in unethical ways.] Of course, those who attempt to crush anti-evolutionary dissent are no match for the growing grassroots [http://creation.com/question-evolution Question evolution! campaign] and its [http://creation.com/15-questions 15 questions for evolutionists], [[global atheism]] shrinking and its expected accelerated shrinking which is going to impact Western atheism, the [[Essay: 10 reasons why American atheism will be cut by at least 50%|10 factors]] which are going to negatively affect American atheism and the explosive growth of [[global Christianity]]. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 00:24, 19 March 2012 (EDT)

Do you see the sheer beauty of this simple, yet powerful solution? It elegantly explains why evolutionism violates the tenets of open science, does it not? Namely, evolutionism displays these characteristics: evolutionists have  [http://creation.com/that-quote-about-the-missing-transitional-fossils "trade secrets"] that they attempt to keep from the public and evolutionists futilely [http://usstore.creation.com/catalog/slaughter-dissidents-p-963.html?osCsid=de3u859284nnchqbskrigeuaf4 attempting to crush dissent in unethical ways.] Of course, those who attempt to crush anti-evolutionary dissent are no match for: the growing grassroots [http://creation.com/question-evolution Question evolution! campaign] and its [http://creation.com/15-questions 15 questions for evolutionists], [[global atheism]] shrinking and its expected accelerated shrinking which is going to impact Western atheism, the [[Essay: 10 reasons why American atheism will be cut by at least 50%|10 factors]] which are going to negatively affect American atheism and the explosive growth of [[global Christianity]]. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 00:24, 19 March 2012 (EDT)

:::By the way, two reservoirs of [[creation science|creation scientists]]' insight on the global warming controversy can be found [http://creation.com/search HERE] and [http://www.icr.org/index.php?search=AdvancedSearch&f_keyword_all=&f_context_all=any&f_keyword_exact=global+warming&f_context_exact=any&f_keyword_any=global+warming&f_context_any=title&f_keyword_without=&f_context_without=any&f_search_type=all&f_articles_date_begin=&f_articles_date_end=&f_authorID=&f_topicID=&f_typeID=&f_type=&f_events_date_begin=&f_events_date_end=&f_regionID=&f_radio_date_begin=&f_radio_date_end=&f_format=&section=0&f_constraint=both&module=home&action=submitsearch HERE]. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 00:46, 19 March 2012 (EDT)

:::By the way, two reservoirs of [[creation science|creation scientists]]' insight on the global warming controversy can be found [http://creation.com/search HERE] and [http://www.icr.org/index.php?search=AdvancedSearch&f_keyword_all=&f_context_all=any&f_keyword_exact=global+warming&f_context_exact=any&f_keyword_any=global+warming&f_context_any=title&f_keyword_without=&f_context_without=any&f_search_type=all&f_articles_date_begin=&f_articles_date_end=&f_authorID=&f_topicID=&f_typeID=&f_type=&f_events_date_begin=&f_events_date_end=&f_regionID=&f_radio_date_begin=&f_radio_date_end=&f_format=&section=0&f_constraint=both&module=home&action=submitsearch HERE]. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 00:46, 19 March 2012 (EDT)

No I do not see how that explains anything. What you just said makes absolutely no sense. I'm puzzled that you can actually read or write, because you certainly do not show any clarity. It seems like the only arguments you have are you declaring atheism is coming to and end and citing Christian websites. [[User:Clarkbc|Clarkbc]] 01:28, 19 March 2012 (EDT)

No I do not see how that explains anything. What you just said makes absolutely no sense. I'm puzzled that you can actually read or write, because you certainly do not show any clarity. It seems like the only arguments you have are you declaring atheism is coming to and end and citing Christian websites. [[User:Clarkbc|Clarkbc]] 01:28, 19 March 2012 (EDT)

::Clarkbc, setting aside the Book of Revelation which certainly speaks of "the end" which I have never mentioned in relation to atheism, where did I ever say that atheism would come to an end and what sources did I employ? Did I not rather provide resources concerning the [[Decline of atheism]]? Are you engaging in sloppy thinking and "argumentation" and/or deceit (see: [[Atheism and deception]]). Second, are you familiar with the genetic fallacy and are you once again engaging in sloppy thinking and argumentation?  By the way, deep down we know that atheism is already intellectually dead and that is why the ex-militant atheist and agnostic [[Richard Dawkins]] (we know the so called [[weak atheism]] is dressed up covert agnosticism and also intellectually dead), has a [[Atheism and cowardice|cowardice problem]] when it comes to debating conservative Christianity. Feel free to engage in [[last wordism]] at this point. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 04:15, 19 March 2012 (EDT)

::Clarkbc, setting aside the Book of Revelation which certainly speaks of "the end" which I have never mentioned in relation to atheism, where did I ever say that atheism would come to an end and what sources did I employ? Did I not rather provide resources concerning the [[Decline of atheism]]? Are you engaging in sloppy thinking and "argumentation" and/or deceit (see: [[Atheism and deception]]). Second, are you familiar with the genetic fallacy and are you once again engaging in sloppy thinking and argumentation?  By the way, deep down we know that atheism is already intellectually dead and that is why the ex-militant atheist and agnostic [[Richard Dawkins]] (we know the so called [[weak atheism]] is dressed up covert agnosticism and also intellectually dead), has a [[Atheism and cowardice|cowardice problem]] when it comes to debating conservative Christianity. Feel free to engage in [[last wordism]] at this point. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 04:15, 19 March 2012 (EDT)

:::Wow--just checking this thread again. Clarkbc doesn't seem to want to engage in an actual discussion about the facts. I fear for the future of our country when debates digress into name-calling. I can see now why this page is locked: many who might edit it have no interest in advancing the discussion for the greater good. Although I do disagree that, "those who attempt to crush anti-evolutionary dissent are no match for the growing grassroots." You should never underestimate the strength of a theory that had been around for 150 years. [[User:Scottma|Scottma]] 15:38, 2 April 2012 (EDT)

:::Wow--just checking this thread again. Clarkbc doesn't seem to want to engage in an actual discussion about the facts. I fear for the future of our country when debates digress into name-calling. I can see now why this page is locked: many who might edit it have no interest in advancing the discussion for the greater good. Although I do disagree that, "those who attempt to crush anti-evolutionary dissent are no match for the growing grassroots." You should never underestimate the strength of a theory that had been around for 150 years. [[User:Scottma|Scottma]] 15:38, 2 April 2012 (EDT)