11
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 41:
Line 41: + +
→Factual error
Hate to say it, but Factcheck was right. It's been proven as fact multiple times...it's actually better understood and more of a fact than gravity. [[User:Kicple|Kicple]] 18:15, 3 April 2012 (EDT)
Hate to say it, but Factcheck was right. It's been proven as fact multiple times...it's actually better understood and more of a fact than gravity. [[User:Kicple|Kicple]] 18:15, 3 April 2012 (EDT)
:::Unlike gravity, macroevolution has never been observed. According to evolutionist Richard Dawkins, "Evolution has been observed. It’s just that it hasn’t been observed while it’s happening." :) [http://creation.com/has-evolution-been-observed-dawkins] Dawkins reminds me of Bill Clinton. It depends on how you define the word "is". [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 18:30, 3 April 2012 (EDT)
:::Unlike gravity, macroevolution has never been observed. According to evolutionist Richard Dawkins, "Evolution has been observed. It’s just that it hasn’t been observed while it’s happening." :) [http://creation.com/has-evolution-been-observed-dawkins] Dawkins reminds me of Bill Clinton. It depends on how you define the word "is". [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 18:30, 3 April 2012 (EDT)
::::Using that logic, you can't prove Creation, either. Sure, it's been well-recorded and well-documented, but no one alive now actually saw it happen. Same goes for evolution; difference is, one has a book backing it up, the other has actual research to back it up.
::::I'd also like to say, in order to get it out of the way, that my opinion of the Bible is the same as Thomas Jefferson's...great role model, not so great a textbook. [[User:Kicple|Kicple]] 01:40, 6 April 2012 (EDT)
== Evolution as a theory or hypothesis ==
== Evolution as a theory or hypothesis ==