Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 14: Line 14:     
Ben, what is your standard for having "enough to brag about?" Is it the amount Wikipedia has... if so that's like comparing apples to oranges. 60,000 views is a LOT. Some cooperate websites never get anywhere near this many views yet they pay thousands for website development. Having 60,000 views with only a handful of active users '''''is''''' something to brag about in my opinion. [[User:PhilipB|PhilipB]] 14:24, 10 January 2007 (EST)
 
Ben, what is your standard for having "enough to brag about?" Is it the amount Wikipedia has... if so that's like comparing apples to oranges. 60,000 views is a LOT. Some cooperate websites never get anywhere near this many views yet they pay thousands for website development. Having 60,000 views with only a handful of active users '''''is''''' something to brag about in my opinion. [[User:PhilipB|PhilipB]] 14:24, 10 January 2007 (EST)
*'''Reply''' Comparing our page view stats to wikipedia's is not like comparing apples to oranges.  We are the same type of site as wikipedia. --[[User:TimSvendsen|TimSvendsen]] 15:34, 10 January 2007 (EST)
+
*'''Reply''' Comparing our page view stats to wikipedia's is not like comparing apples to oranges.  We are the same type of site as [[wikipedia. --[[User:TimSvendsen|TimSvendsen]] 15:34, 10 January 2007 (EST)
 
** Tim, last time I checked Conservapedia had a little less than a hundred users. Wikipedia has 3,216,930... I think that's apples to oranges, at least in terms of size and users. [[User:PhilipB|PhilipB]] 15:40, 10 January 2007 (EST)
 
** Tim, last time I checked Conservapedia had a little less than a hundred users. Wikipedia has 3,216,930... I think that's apples to oranges, at least in terms of size and users. [[User:PhilipB|PhilipB]] 15:40, 10 January 2007 (EST)
 
***'''Reply'''  It is not like comparing apples to oranges, it is like comparing a tiny little green apple on a tree to a fully developed apple ready to eat.  Eventually we want to be as big as Wikipedia, until then why brag about being small? --[[User:TimSvendsen|TimSvendsen]] 19:14, 10 January 2007 (EST)
 
***'''Reply'''  It is not like comparing apples to oranges, it is like comparing a tiny little green apple on a tree to a fully developed apple ready to eat.  Eventually we want to be as big as Wikipedia, until then why brag about being small? --[[User:TimSvendsen|TimSvendsen]] 19:14, 10 January 2007 (EST)
Line 31: Line 31:  
: Finally, we do have 24 entries discussing World War II.  Be sure to click "Search" not "Go" to find all the material.  --[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 16:53, 10 January 2007 (EST)
 
: Finally, we do have 24 entries discussing World War II.  Be sure to click "Search" not "Go" to find all the material.  --[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 16:53, 10 January 2007 (EST)
 
* '''Reply''' We have 24 entries that ''mention'' WWII, but we don't have an entry ''about'' WWII. --[[User:TimSvendsen|TimSvendsen]] 19:14, 10 January 2007 (EST)
 
* '''Reply''' We have 24 entries that ''mention'' WWII, but we don't have an entry ''about'' WWII. --[[User:TimSvendsen|TimSvendsen]] 19:14, 10 January 2007 (EST)
 +
 +
 +
Tim,
 +
 +
Check [[World War II|this]] out.
 +
 +
[[User:DeborahB.|~Deborah~]]
Siteadmin, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, Administrators
2,684

edits

Navigation menu