Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, Moderators, move, protect, rollback, Administrators
27,336
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 28:
Line 28: − − == Gay gene and evolution == − − I just would like to point out, that if gay gene existed, it would mean that on the ground of theory of evolution, homosexuality is kind of genetic defect. Somehow most of people talking about this subject never go to this conclusion, because they are against at least one of the premises. The liberals won't admit that because they believe in evolution, believe in gay gene, and believe that homosexuality is equal with heterosexuality. The third one makes the conclusion politically incorrect for them. If we just reject the third assumption, we get the conclusion: homosexuality is genetic defect. At least if evolution is true... [[User:WJM|PB]] 17:17, 27 May 2012 (EDT)
Reverted edits by WJM (talk) to last revision by Gumbi
What makes the Bible "the most comprehensive transcendent moral authority"? Maybe it is to some people, but not to everyone. And just because it is to some people, doesn't make it so. What makes the Bible any more important than the Qur'an?
What makes the Bible "the most comprehensive transcendent moral authority"? Maybe it is to some people, but not to everyone. And just because it is to some people, doesn't make it so. What makes the Bible any more important than the Qur'an?