Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
→‎Update?: Excellent point. I added an update, and please feel free to improve it.
Line 23: Line 23:  
==Update?==
 
==Update?==
 
This page seems to require some updating since it speaks of the decision in the future tense and does not reflect the fact that the Supreme Court voted 5-4 to uphold the statute. Thanks, [[User:Wschact|Wschact]] 21:29, 7 July 2012 (EDT)
 
This page seems to require some updating since it speaks of the decision in the future tense and does not reflect the fact that the Supreme Court voted 5-4 to uphold the statute. Thanks, [[User:Wschact|Wschact]] 21:29, 7 July 2012 (EDT)
 +
 +
:Excellent point.  I added an update, and please feel free to improve it.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 21:34, 7 July 2012 (EDT)
Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,794

edits

Navigation menu