54
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 348:
Line 348: + +
→Counterexamples to Recent Experiments
Recently, experiments have been published in Science, directly measuring general relativistic time dilation effects using atomic clocks placed about a metre apart. Do we have any idea how to refute this? The reference I provide is to a newspaper summary of the findings [http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/einsteins-theory-is-proved--and-it-is-bad-news-if-you-own-a-penthouse-2088195.html]. I have also read the paper and see no loopholes.
Recently, experiments have been published in Science, directly measuring general relativistic time dilation effects using atomic clocks placed about a metre apart. Do we have any idea how to refute this? The reference I provide is to a newspaper summary of the findings [http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/einsteins-theory-is-proved--and-it-is-bad-news-if-you-own-a-penthouse-2088195.html]. I have also read the paper and see no loopholes.
--[[User:DanPW|DanPW]] 12:49, 20 July 2012 (EDT)
--[[User:DanPW|DanPW]] 12:49, 20 July 2012 (EDT)
:Probably our best bet is personal attacks on the researcher, Chou, or possibly [[NIST]]. I suspect Chou was not born in this country. He may have an agenda to confuse American citizens. [[User:Spielman|Spielman]] 14:35, 20 July 2012 (EDT)