SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
1,134
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 40:
Line 40: + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
→NathanG: new section
I just about finished working on [[Chomsky hierarchy]], which involves the same sort of things as [[Context-free grammar]]. Could I ask you to have a look at [[Chomsky hierarchy]] and let me know if it is perhaps a little more accessible to the average reader (any constructive comments are welcome). If you are happy with my style and level of writing, then I intend to turn my hand to rewriting [[Context-free grammar]] in a similar vein. [[User:RolandPlankton|RolandPlankton]] 15:15, 10 May 2012 (EDT)
I just about finished working on [[Chomsky hierarchy]], which involves the same sort of things as [[Context-free grammar]]. Could I ask you to have a look at [[Chomsky hierarchy]] and let me know if it is perhaps a little more accessible to the average reader (any constructive comments are welcome). If you are happy with my style and level of writing, then I intend to turn my hand to rewriting [[Context-free grammar]] in a similar vein. [[User:RolandPlankton|RolandPlankton]] 15:15, 10 May 2012 (EDT)
:Looks good to me. Well done. I have been very busy the past few weeks so I haven't been around. --[[User:DamianJohn|DamianJohn]] 21:32, 12 May 2012 (EDT)
:Looks good to me. Well done. I have been very busy the past few weeks so I haven't been around. --[[User:DamianJohn|DamianJohn]] 21:32, 12 May 2012 (EDT)
== NathanG ==
I unblocked this user because I was looking through his last 10 contributions or so, and couldn't figure out why he'd been blocked.[http://conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/NathanG]
Some appear to be reasonably constructive, fixing typos or changing British spelling to English: [http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Messianic_Judaism&diff=prev&oldid=536464][http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Epistle_to_the_Hebrews&diff=prev&oldid=536462][http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Desegregation_of_Central_High_School_(1957)&diff=prev&oldid=536457][http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Schenck_v._United_States&diff=prev&oldid=536455][http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Ich_bin_ein_Berliner&diff=prev&oldid=536454][http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Original_sin&diff=prev&oldid=536435][http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Electronic_Frontier_Foundation&diff=prev&oldid=536434][http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Sentencing_guidelines&diff=prev&oldid=536433][http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=University_of_Arkansas&diff=prev&oldid=536350][http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Wei_v._Bodner&diff=prev&oldid=536349][http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Hazleton&diff=prev&oldid=536348][http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Pat_Roberts&diff=prev&oldid=536347][http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Grant_Wood&diff=prev&oldid=536341][http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Christian_apologetics_of_C.S._Lewis&diff=prev&oldid=536315][http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Jamestown_Massacre&diff=prev&oldid=536310][http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=William_Cavendish&diff=prev&oldid=536309][http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Thomas_Pelham-Holles&diff=prev&oldid=536308][http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Henry_Pelham&diff=prev&oldid=536307][http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Spencer_Compton&diff=prev&oldid=536306][http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Robert_Walpole&diff=prev&oldid=536305][http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=James_Strang&diff=prev&oldid=536304][http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Librarian&diff=prev&oldid=536303]
Others were talk page discussions just dealing with grammar: [http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Internet&diff=prev&oldid=536438]
Those which added substantial content didn't appear particularly bad: [http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Garden&diff=prev&oldid=536432]
Those are all pretty solid proofreading contributions for his last 20 contributions or so. I looked further and still can't see that he even made any particularly controversial edits. If so, can you point where they are at? I haven't heard anything from this NathanG person and have no idea if they're still around, I just was looking at people recently blocked to make sure the blocks were appropriate. I couldn't see anything indicating a proper block here.
You said "he is a self admitted liberal parodist." Well, whether that's true I have no idea. I certainly saw no indication this was the case from the contributions. Instead all I saw was the mark of a solid proofreader who was interested in helping the site with its grammar. I value proofreading pretty highly myself, the edits impressed me, frankly. And even if you were right that he's a liberal parodist, I thought we didn't ban off of ideology alone anyway, right? According to the guidelines?[http://conservapedia.com/Conservapedia:Guidelines] I mean, we have debate pages so those who disagree can be talked with, right? Otherwise, what would be the point of just letting one side debate all the time?
Anyway, can you show me some sign the initial ban was appropriate? I thought I had seen that the person blocking him was now blocked, which made me really question whether the current block was still appropriate. --[[User:Jzyehoshua|Joshua Zambrano]] 07:44, 25 July 2012 (EDT)