Changes

You said "he is a self admitted liberal parodist." Well, whether that's true I have no idea. I certainly saw no indication this was the case from the contributions. Instead all I saw was the mark of a solid proofreader who was interested in helping the site with its grammar. I value proofreading pretty highly myself, the edits impressed me, frankly. And even if you were right that he's a liberal parodist, I thought we didn't ban off of ideology alone anyway, right? According to the guidelines?[http://conservapedia.com/Conservapedia:Guidelines] I mean, we have debate pages so those who disagree can be talked with, right? Otherwise, what would be the point of just letting one side debate all the time?  

You said "he is a self admitted liberal parodist." Well, whether that's true I have no idea. I certainly saw no indication this was the case from the contributions. Instead all I saw was the mark of a solid proofreader who was interested in helping the site with its grammar. I value proofreading pretty highly myself, the edits impressed me, frankly. And even if you were right that he's a liberal parodist, I thought we didn't ban off of ideology alone anyway, right? According to the guidelines?[http://conservapedia.com/Conservapedia:Guidelines] I mean, we have debate pages so those who disagree can be talked with, right? Otherwise, what would be the point of just letting one side debate all the time?  

Anyway, can you show me some sign the initial ban was appropriate? I thought I had seen that the person blocking him was now blocked, which made me really question whether the current block was still appropriate. --[[User:Jzyehoshua|Joshua Zambrano]] 07:44, 25 July 2012 (EDT)

Anyway, can you show me some sign the initial ban was appropriate? A BIG FACTOR for me was that the person who blocked him, TK, is now blocked[http://conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/TK], which made me really question whether the current block was still appropriate. --[[User:Jzyehoshua|Joshua Zambrano]] 07:44, 25 July 2012 (EDT)