SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
1,134
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 56:
Line 56: + +
→NathanG
Anyway, can you show me some sign the initial ban was appropriate? A BIG FACTOR for me was that the person who blocked him, TK, is now blocked[http://conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/TK], which made me really question whether the current block was still appropriate. --[[User:Jzyehoshua|Joshua Zambrano]] 07:44, 25 July 2012 (EDT)
Anyway, can you show me some sign the initial ban was appropriate? A BIG FACTOR for me was that the person who blocked him, TK, is now blocked[http://conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/TK], which made me really question whether the current block was still appropriate. --[[User:Jzyehoshua|Joshua Zambrano]] 07:44, 25 July 2012 (EDT)
I have no idea what he could've done, to make you so angry at him, but just based on what I've seen from the proofreading contributions he's made, unless it was some really serious vandalism that he committed to get banned, I still think he should be given another shot. Those are pretty solid, un-controversial edits that make perfect sense to me. And the editor who blocked him is banned now anyway. You've got to admit, from my point of view, it makes a lot of sense to unblock him unless some really strong evidence shows up for why he got blocked in the first place. --[[User:Jzyehoshua|Joshua Zambrano]] 07:51, 25 July 2012 (EDT)