679
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 301:
Line 301: + + + + Line 328:
Line 332: −
→Fairness
*I am sorry and sad if postulating heresy makes you uneasy, or that you latch on to your misinterpretations to try and denigrate, marginalize and insult those you disagree with. You might want to ask yourself why you are so hostile to anyone suggesting alternatives to what you have preconceived notions about.....and I am not talking about stating that the Nazi's were leftists, though in matters of governance they indeed were, in model and form. Do you lack any form of intellectual openness to examine the differences between what intellectuals said in the 1930's and and the reality of their actual administration of government as opposed to their political thoughts? All I see above, posted by others in the past six hours or so, is a couple of people wanting to "bang out" a page, based on their preconceived notions, and excluding all others who might dare to suggest others topics. --~ [[User:TK|TK]] <sup>[[User_talk:TK|MyTalk]]</sup> 15:15, 10 April 2007 (EDT)
*I am sorry and sad if postulating heresy makes you uneasy, or that you latch on to your misinterpretations to try and denigrate, marginalize and insult those you disagree with. You might want to ask yourself why you are so hostile to anyone suggesting alternatives to what you have preconceived notions about.....and I am not talking about stating that the Nazi's were leftists, though in matters of governance they indeed were, in model and form. Do you lack any form of intellectual openness to examine the differences between what intellectuals said in the 1930's and and the reality of their actual administration of government as opposed to their political thoughts? All I see above, posted by others in the past six hours or so, is a couple of people wanting to "bang out" a page, based on their preconceived notions, and excluding all others who might dare to suggest others topics. --~ [[User:TK|TK]] <sup>[[User_talk:TK|MyTalk]]</sup> 15:15, 10 April 2007 (EDT)
::So far you have not shown enough knowledge about history to lead anyone to believe that you're really aware of the Nazi's policies in "matters of governance." And calling the Nazis' "intellectuals" is as ridiculous as calling them "leftists". They were, like most despots, profoundly ANTI-intellectual, as their book bonfires, their library purges, and their attacks on "degenerate" art shows indicate.
::I don't "bang out" pages based on preconceived notions. I base them on \reading of history, contemporary accounts and in some cases, first hand conversations with people who actually exprienced the Nazi era and/or the Red Scare. If you have sources to offer that contradict what I've posted about the Nazis opposition to feminism, avant garde art, and the rights of minorities, by all means cite them. --[[User:PF Fox|PF Fox]] 12:30, 11 April 2007 (EDT)
::PF's a guy who's views we need to study and reflect upon. A true Wikipedian in that regard, his views are unchanging and undetered by facts. For example, on the KKK page I laid out two plausible courses for development of that article [[Talk:Ku Klux Klan#Moving forward]]. PF opted to pursue the first of these two. What followed was comical [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Ku_Klux_Klan&diff=prev&oldid=93534][http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Ku_Klux_Klan&diff=next&oldid=93534][http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Ku_Klux_Klan&diff=next&oldid=93627][http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Ku_Klux_Klan&diff=next&oldid=93644][http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Ku_Klux_Klan&diff=next&oldid=93711] in the vein of the a classic POV nuclear arms race. This can't be anything other than frustrating to those who insist upon this kind of an approach. [[User:RobS|RobS]] 15:19, 10 April 2007 (EDT)
::PF's a guy who's views we need to study and reflect upon. A true Wikipedian in that regard, his views are unchanging and undetered by facts. For example, on the KKK page I laid out two plausible courses for development of that article [[Talk:Ku Klux Klan#Moving forward]]. PF opted to pursue the first of these two. What followed was comical [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Ku_Klux_Klan&diff=prev&oldid=93534][http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Ku_Klux_Klan&diff=next&oldid=93534][http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Ku_Klux_Klan&diff=next&oldid=93627][http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Ku_Klux_Klan&diff=next&oldid=93644][http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Ku_Klux_Klan&diff=next&oldid=93711] in the vein of the a classic POV nuclear arms race. This can't be anything other than frustrating to those who insist upon this kind of an approach. [[User:RobS|RobS]] 15:19, 10 April 2007 (EDT)
*Now if I acted like most here, I would say that because no further discussion, all is decided, make the changes, and be "done".--~ [[User:TK|TK]] <sup>[[User_talk:TK|MyTalk]]</sup> 20:35, 10 April 2007 (EDT)
*Now if I acted like most here, I would say that because no further discussion, all is decided, make the changes, and be "done".--~ [[User:TK|TK]] <sup>[[User_talk:TK|MyTalk]]</sup> 20:35, 10 April 2007 (EDT)
==Definition STILL needed==
==Definition STILL needed==