Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 116: Line 116:  
Lastly, if you don't have money for a translator, I suggest becoming a Protestant and being imbued with the Protestant work ethic as the atheist work ethic is not working out too well for you. I do have a friend who speaks Dutch and an acquaintance in the Netherlands who speaks Dutch as well. Unfortunately for you, their time is valuable and they would expect to get paid to translate even if I were too ask them to translate the material which I won't. I don't want my friends and acquaintances pestered by atheists - especially a tightfisted atheist who would probably be a deadbeat customer. (see: [[Atheism and charity]] and [[Atheism and morality]]).  [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 15:14, 12 August 2012 (EDT)
 
Lastly, if you don't have money for a translator, I suggest becoming a Protestant and being imbued with the Protestant work ethic as the atheist work ethic is not working out too well for you. I do have a friend who speaks Dutch and an acquaintance in the Netherlands who speaks Dutch as well. Unfortunately for you, their time is valuable and they would expect to get paid to translate even if I were too ask them to translate the material which I won't. I don't want my friends and acquaintances pestered by atheists - especially a tightfisted atheist who would probably be a deadbeat customer. (see: [[Atheism and charity]] and [[Atheism and morality]]).  [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 15:14, 12 August 2012 (EDT)
 
:Conservative, there are many online freeware translating sites/pieces of software. If the article were translated by one of these, would you consider that acceptable? Come to think of it, is there a note somewhere in Conservapedia policies about what makes for an acceptable translation? If not, that's something administrators might want to consider adding.--[[User:DTSavage|DTSavage]] 15:36, 12 August 2012 (EDT)
 
:Conservative, there are many online freeware translating sites/pieces of software. If the article were translated by one of these, would you consider that acceptable? Come to think of it, is there a note somewhere in Conservapedia policies about what makes for an acceptable translation? If not, that's something administrators might want to consider adding.--[[User:DTSavage|DTSavage]] 15:36, 12 August 2012 (EDT)
 +
 +
::The source for my claim is as trustworthy as the claim about atheists' deceptiveness. As far as Biblical Christian closed-mindedness and work ethics is concerned: I speak and write seven languages, which allows me to get my information from a variety of news sources and (the irony!) to give spelling lessons to native speakers like you. Anyway, I am sorry your "friends" are too stingy to even do you a small favor.
 +
::Back to the article USA and bestiality. Why do you want it to meet much stricter standards than the other articles about bestiality? [[User:Baobab|Baobab]] 16:16, 12 August 2012 (EDT)
80

edits

Navigation menu