Talk:Glenn Greenwald

Pokeria, what you posted may be true; however, it was placed for one reason only, to attack the person. This article needs more information about his work and life, and then maybe it can be added back in. Especially today, being that Greenwald is about one of perhaps a dozen real journalists remaining on planet earth, and people are starved for information. RobS^{Free Kyle!} 02:56, July 20, 2021 (EDT)

Since when have there been any REAL journalists? They've all been the same. Even Walter Lippmann from early in the 20th century pretty much created "Objective Journalism" specifically to act as propaganda on behalf of left-wing crap. Pretty much admitted as much in his book Public Opinion, specifically the chapter "Manufacturing of Public Consent". Just ask ProgressingAmerica if you don't believe me. He'll tell you, has written plenty of blogs exposing him as a fraud who arguably wrecked journalism even worse than muckraking and yellow journalism ever did, which is saying a lot. And let's not forget Walter Cronkite, the quintessential journalist back during the mid-20th century that people looked up to, and abused his authority to shill for the left in a far more subdued manner and also even had the gall to lie through his teeth about the Tet Offensive. And attacks or not, they're still facts. Were the roles were reversed and you added them in as a way to attack him, I wouldn't dare remove your categories precisely BECAUSE, attacks or not, they're still factual and thus are obligated to remain. This is meant to be an encyclopedia, where we state facts. Even attack facts are STILL facts. Pokeria1 (talk) 06:51, July 20, 2021 (EDT)

Okay, so I misspoke. A few decades ago there were a couple of dozen. Today, there's maybe five. And Greenwald is one. RobS^{Free Kyle!} 07:34, July 20, 2021 (EDT)