From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Shouldn't the saying be "all the above"? Human 17:05, 29 August 2008 (EDT)

That seems to be the smallest of this article's problems. Anyone want to rewrite it in something more closely resembling English? Human 17:08, 29 August 2008 (EDT)
It seems to be "all of the above", actually. And while I think your last remark went a bit far, this article does need some rewriting. Aside from some grammar, there is also unnecessary opinion-pushing in the middle, and the article seems to be a collection of random ideas. I'll see if I can dig out some sources (this isn't really my special field) later today or tomorrow. But if others want to fix this sooner, be my guest. Do we have some sort of "Needs work plz" template? --DirkB 17:16, 29 August 2008 (EDT)
Human, trying being more humane instead of publicly complaining. Why don't you make the needed corrections, contribute more new articles and move on. Your attitude is proving valid with #15 and #20 of Essay:Liberal_Behavior_on_Conservapedia. -- 50 star flag.png jp 17:27, 29 August 2008 (EDT)
I didn't make any changes for one main reason. Since the article needs more than simple spelling or grammar fixes, it would need to be rearranged and rewritten. I suspect that if I did what I think would make this article better my changes would be reverted, since I would probably dilute the perspective it is written from. I didn't fix the "all ... above" thing because I thought it might have been a direct quote from somewhere. I usually do make corrections when I see them needed, in fact I did some work on one of Mr. Schlafly's History Lectures. I don't think pointing out that something that I would never bother to work on needs serious work is "complaining", and I have started many articles on CP in my year and a half here. But, sorry if I offended... Human 18:32, 29 August 2008 (EDT)
I have cleaned up the grammar but the "facts" I'll leave to the more intrepid editors. Marge 19:44, 29 August 2008 (EDT)