Talk:Wikimedia Commons

"Wikimedia Commons as a massive amateur porn hub"

Hi,
This problem probably is worth mentioning, but may I suggest we take a much less "in-your-face" approach to it, even if they don't? CP is supposed to by family-friendly, so it doesn't seem to me like in-depth descriptions and suggested search terms are a good idea. Any thoughts? --David B ^(TALK) 09:52, 1 September 2017 (EDT)

I've made an edit which I believe improves it without removing the thrust of the original text. NeilWalker (talk) 10:08, 1 September 2017 (EDT)

By the way, David, when you changed the wording, part of the wording you changed was part of a quote: [1] --1990'sguy (talk) 10:12, 1 September 2017 (EDT)

NeilWalker, that sounds much better to me, though admittedly, it does take out the "shock value." It looks fine to me, though.

1990'sguy, good catch. Without quote marks, I didn't realize it was a quote. The diligent thing for me to do would have been to check the reference first though. --David B ^(TALK) 10:21, 1 September 2017 (EDT)

I know that AK's editing style is to add long quotes in references, so if you are curious about any of his edits in the future, it is always good to remember that. :) --1990'sguy (talk) 10:23, 1 September 2017 (EDT)