Talk:William S. Burroughs
Correcting the assumption that burroughs was some precursor to the cowling LGBTSJW social engineers of today
Burroughs was, without a doubt, morally subversive. I think one should remember however, that he was pro-second amendment, against the new deal (because he saw it's failure to keep money and jobs going or to keep folks employed), and felt that the patrician caretaking of modern liberal society robbed people of prosperity, sewed the seeds of violence, division, radicalism, encouraged war, made the citizen less able to achieve financial independence and encouraged him to go along with schemes against the person and his wealth that created individuals who would do things to themselves (drugging, consuming mindless [stuff], giving their autonomy and money over to a system that left them malnourished, vulnerable, afraid, ready to go along with whatever money taking or fear mongering scheme that could be invented leaving society made of of fearful individuals incapable of taking care of themselves) they never would have otherwise done. The only columnist he read was westbrook pegler (patriotic american and opponent of the new deal which destroyed american society) and he believed in the rugged frontier individualism of the old west. He definitely wouldn't have been with the SJWs of today who want to force their lifestyle onto others, into education, onto children, want to rewrite the biological story of man to suit them, and silence anyone who defends the idea of two genders or defends male heterosexuality. Burroughs would rightly consider that another fear mongering womanish limp wristed modern liberal scheme, and he hated gays that were pussies. --Mitchelville (talk) 03:19, 8 January 2019 (EST)
- I agree Westbrook Pegler is one of the two or three credible Washington journalists of that era. Other than that, I don't know anything about Burroughs. RobSDeep Six the Deep State! 03:38, 8 January 2019 (EST)
- Look back at his comments and much of what he wrote on politics. Without a doubt, burroughs was morally subversive, but he was against liberalism, believed in the 2nd amendment and had no time for the liberal big society project. --Mitchelville (talk) 13:48, 8 January 2019 (EST)