User talk:CherryS

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Useful links


Hello, CherryS, and welcome to Conservapedia!

We're glad you are here to edit. We ask that you read our Editor's Guide before you edit.

At the right are some useful links for you. You can include these links on your user page by putting "{{Useful links}}" on the page. Any questions--ask!

Thanks for reading, CherryS!

Bugler 15:12, 11 June 2008 (EDT)


"Must make sure 'erotic' is not subjective, as homosexuals find many innocent non-erotic things erotic (ie, the military, cowboys, etc)." - please avoid senseless generalizations like this. Wandering 15:46, 13 June 2008 (EDT)

I'm not saying that all homosexuals find the military erotic, but many I have witnessed do. The military and cowboys (for example in Brokeback Mountain) are major themes in many "gay" media productions. CherryS 14:48 13 June 2008 (CDT)


Hi! Thank you for the addition to the katakana entry - always nice to know one isn't doing these things alone :) Arigatou! JessicaTOhayo gozaimasu! 18:33, 14 June 2008 (EDT)

George Bush Sewage Plant

::blinks eyes:: I almost can't believe that's true. WOW. They really will stoop to any depth. Thanks for the contribution. -Foxtrot 13:02, 27 September 2008 (EDT)


I fixed up the references for you. :) --Kata 12:44, 31 October 2008 (EDT)

Thanks so much! --CherryS 12:04, 31 October 2008 (EDT)

I look forward to reading your upcoming material

I see you have an interest in early Christianity. I look foreward to reading your upcoming material having to do with the early church (for example, people like Luke, Papias, Justin Martyr, etc.). conservative 22:06, 30 April 2009 (EDT)

Ha, well, I'm no expert! But I can make it a project, certainly. I'll try to get started as soon as my finals are over. :) --CherryS 12:04, 1 May 2009 (EDT)

P-Adic Numbers

Hi there! I saw you were a contributor to the p-adic numbers article, and your description gave me the impression you were only given a brief mention of it in a class. That's a shame, because they are fascinating and yield tons of insights (they're essential to the proof of Fermat's Last Theorem, for example). So, if you're interested, you might like to take a look at an article I wrote over at ProofWiki, found at and also, if you are REALLY interested, pick up P-adic Analysis by Neal Koblitz. JacobB 10:42, 14 July 2009 (EDT)