User talk:Davidspencer

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Useful links


Hello, Davidspencer, and welcome to Conservapedia!

We're glad you are here to edit. We ask that you read our Editor's Guide before you edit.

At the right are some useful links for you. You can include these links on your user page by putting "{{Useful links}}" on the page. Any questions--ask!

Thanks for reading, Davidspencer!

Joaquín Martínez 22:50, 9 January 2012 (EST)


Congratulations, your account has just been given three new privileges: SkipCatcha, blocking and rollback privileges.--Andy Schlafly 12:25, 14 January 2012 (EST)

Thank you

David, I appreciate your kindness. Thank you. Nate 01:29, 29 March 2012 (EDT)

Thanks for the kind message. Hope you are well, David. Nate 10:18, 4 August 2012 (EDT)

And in your revert you have removed my message, re added some trolling and deleted the archive link. Please put these back. Dvergne 09:50, 19 January 2013 (EST)

Moto GP

I think you'll find that the real name is the Road Racing World Championship Grand Prix, of which MotoGP is only a category. Your article is a bit bare and lacks a certain something. I'm not really a big Moto fan (now that Stoner is in DV8S) so I'll let you fix it Dvergne 11:13, 7 April 2013 (EDT)

Like you Dvergne, I'm only a VERY casual follower of MotoGP (or RRWCGP). However, while RRWCGP might be the "official name" of sport, I think MotoGP is the more common name used to refer to it as a whole. Much like F1 is "technically" a division within the FIA World Championship Racing Series (or something like that...) but is commonly used to refer the sport in general with the lower divisions treated as simply "feeder series" to F1 as opposed to serious championship series in their own right. I guess maybe we should have MotoGP redirect to RRCWGP or something? I don't know...
Anyway, I digress, that's not why I was posting here. lol. Davidspencer, first let me thank you for your efforts to make this site a viable alternative to Wikipedia and keep the few who are trying to push their extreme views and outside interests in check. I find there are too few of us on here who want to simply display the facts and allow them to speak for themselves against the opposition instead of allowing them to be overshadowed by personal opinion. Once again, I'm getting off topic here...
I was looking at your Moto gp page and thinking of ways to improve it. The first major thought I could come up with was something that could be added to any page on racing series. Do you know how to make a table on here? I don't, but I'm sure we could figure it out if you don't either. I was thinking we could add the following tables:
  1. Previous Seasons: with headings "Year", "Champion", "Manufacturer"
  2. Current Season: with headings "Date", "Race Name", "Pole", "Winner(or top 3 finishers in separate columns?)"
  3. Current Standings with headings "Position", "Rider", "Manufacturer", "Points" and "Wins"
Let me know what you think, I'll copy the relevant part of this rambling post to Talk Page on your MotoGP article. Fnarrow 12:23, 19 April 2013 (EDT)

Reverting my Revert

I never realized you did not like me. Fine then. Now I ask you - how is that thread at all conductive to Conservapedia's goals of becoming an encyclopedia? From what I see, that thread has devolved into namecalling, especially the unconscionable choice of words from user:conservative. Please explain your actions. brenden 16:21, 17 May 2013 (EDT)

It is nothing to do with like or dislike. It is for your own good. This is a fight you will NOT win. Ropb smith tried this and he now edits at ratwiki, he is an ex-person here. Keep this up and you will be as well. Davidspencer 16:23, 17 May 2013 (EDT)