User talk:Feebasfactor/Archive

Got your post

I got your post and erased my first response on my talk page as I posted with undue irration regarding the matter. Please feel free to read my updated post. Conservative 22:29, 14 September 2007 (EDT)

Questions and Obsession....

Entering into the folly of others (see above section) or asking for further information about the actions of misguided people, is exactly why you will be blocked again, if you persist. Avail yourself of email or IM if you wish to persist, but I do advise you to stop with the endless pot stirring on this. --şŷŝôρ-₮K^{Ṣρёаќǃ} 06:03, 15 September 2007 (EDT)

Fair enough... I'll ask no further questions on the issue. If "stirring the pot" constitues trolling than I shall do my best to avoid it. Feebasfactor 14:20, 15 September 2007 (EDT)

Changing your post a day later to troll is trolling. Bye bye now. Godspeed!

(cur) (last) 12:09, 16 September 2007 Feebasfactor (Talk | contribs | block)
(cur) (last) 11:20, 15 September 2007 Feebasfactor (Talk | contribs | block) (→Questions and Obsession....)

--şŷŝôρ-₮K^{Ṣρёаќǃ} 16:33, 16 September 2007 (EDT)

Once again, I'm sorry... the previous reply seemed overly defiant and confrontational, and I could see I had irritated you enough already. I honestly don't want to cause trouble... I'll behave. Feebasfactor 18:26, 16 September 2007 (EDT)

I ain't your Mom! Just try to be more plain spoken, instead of courting misguided sysops posting against policy....that isn't all that hard, if over 18. Even if under! --şŷŝôρ-₮K^{Ṣρёаќǃ} 19:04, 16 September 2007 (EDT)

Thanks!

Formatting those links! Get at me on IM if you have it. It's on my user page. I need to pick up some wiki skillz. --şŷŝôρ-₮K^{Ṣρёаќǃ} 00:54, 22 September 2007 (EDT)

Testing

Spam filter? Is that like a night-lock?

LOL....Exculpatory1 on AIM, if you have it. Yahoo: CPSysop_TK. --şŷŝôρ-₮K^{Ṣρёаќǃ} 23:56, 27 September 2007 (EDT)

Block

your requested block has expired.--Beth^Talk2ME 19:14, 5 October 2007 (EDT)

Thanks... I think I can fit wiki-editing back into my life (in moderation, of course). Feebasfactor 19:20, 5 October 2007 (EDT)

Maybe if you give up editing so many wiki's, in the spirit of moderation, of course, you wouldn't need to ask for blocks? --şŷŝôρ-₮K^{/Ṣρёаќǃ} 05:00, 10 October 2007 (EDT)

Richard Dawkins

Sorry about reverting your edits, I was trying to revert the edits by "OurMike" who made a very liberal edit. Your formatting was good, and I appreciate you working to improve the look of the site.. SSchultz 23:06, 11 October 2007 (EDT)

Too bad you didn't restore his improvements. You are letting a couple of compliments run to your head, SSchultz. You were given blocking to help with vandals, and with that there is no implied consent for you to state what policy is, or insult other, long-term editors. Accordingly you can sit it out a day, and try to grasp that we have Administrators, who actually run the place, who you should be working with. Febasfactor, I restored the page to your last edits. Thank you for not inserting yourself into the argument, but only doing things there to improve the quality of the page! --şŷŝôρ-₮K^{/Ṣρёаќǃ} 02:24, 12 October 2007 (EDT)

Just stay out

Enablers like you are worse than the fascists who run this gulag. You don't agree with them, yet you help clean up? Do you have no conscience of where this will leave our children? A whole generation of homeschoolers will grow up not knowing the truth about their crazy closed off small minded worlds. I hope you can sleep at night. Truthisuniversal 20:05, 20 October 2007 (EDT)

1) What makes you think I don't agree with them? Perhaps not entirely on every political issue, but I do know bias when I see it, and Conservapedia makes remarking bias an important priority.

2) I'm disappointed that you chose to engage in destructive vandalism. If you felt you had something to bring to the site or noted specific errors, why not participate in discussion and debate constructively? Ultimately, your pointless vandalism spree acheived nothing. Feebasfactor 20:27, 20 October 2007 (EDT)

please see my last post on the dawkins talk page

please see my last post on the dawkins talk page. Conservative 15:37, 22 October 2007 (EDT)

Contest

All are welcome, Feebasfactor! Although the 7 highest-scoring members points will be scored, this sharpens the competition to be not only among the opposing teams, but among the team members as well! The ultimate real winner is CP. Please, add your name to the list of those interested! I am certain the Schaf-Flys could use help! :P --şyŝoρ-₮K^{/Ṣρёаќǃ} 14:26, 10 November 2007 (EST)

A good way to get points is putting pics in articles that have none. We have a lot of pics here. --User:Joaquín Martínez, talk 14:34, 11 November 2007 (EST)

Team Name: Supply Siders  --şyŝoρ-₮K^{/Ṣρёаќǃ} 17:03, 11 November 2007 (EST)

Lol! I guilted you huh? Well, I guess that's fair - but before I go you should know that a thousand little kittens with big, sad eyes will be violently killed if you don't continue to edit.--19:26, 12 November 2007 (EST)

Revolted

Like what? I need an authoratitve source to say that Herman Minkowski was involved with developing SR? (http://www-groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/Biographies/Minkowski.html - "Minkowski developed a new view of space and time and laid the mathematical foundation of the theory of relativity. By 1907 Minkowski realised that the work of Lorentz and Einstein could be best understood in a non-euclidean space. He considered space and time, which were formerly thought to be independent, to be coupled together in a four-dimensional 'space-time continuum'. Minkowski worked out a four-dimensional treatment of electrodynamics. His major works in this area are Raum und Zeit (1907) and Zwei Abhand lungen über die Grundgleichungen der Elektrodynamik (1909).").

Wait, wait, I know, I need a source say that Henri Poincaré and Hendrik Lorentz's formulas were only related to electrodynamics, and did not refute the aether? (http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates/1902/lorentz-bio.html "In an extensive treatise on the aberration of light and the problems arising in connection with it, he followed A.J. Fresnel's hypothesis of the existence of an immovable ether, which freely penetrates all bodies.")

Hold on, is it that I need a source that states that Dicke died a well respected physicist, not "hurt professionally?" - (http://articles.adsabs.harvard.edu//full/1997BAAS...29.1469P/0001469.000.html "Though not consistantly a member of the American Astronomical Society, he was awarded the Society's Beatrice M. Tinsley Prize in 1992")

No, no, that's not it, it must be that I need a source that the Kaluza–Klein theory was a model that attempted to merge theories of gravation and electromagnatism. (http://www.matter-antimatter.com/kaluza-klein_theory.htm "The Modern Kaluza-Klein Theory unifies Maxwell's Theory of Electromagnetic and Einstein's Theory of General Relativity & Gravity.")

It is readily apparent that this site has some motive to slander Robert Dicke. If he were alive he would be disgusted to be used as fodder for the political grist mill. This quote was telling, from the founder and ultimate boss - "It's bias to insist on describing theories that compete with relativity in terms of relativity." - It's BIAS TO INSIST ON DESCRIBING BRANS-DICKE IN TERMS OF RELATIVITY? From Dicke's abstract - (http://prola.aps.org/abstract/PR/v124/i3/p925_1 - "A modified relativistic theory of gravitation, apparently compatible with Mach's principle, is developed.") Physicsnut 09:40, 19 December 2007 (EST)

Studying CP

Right now it is for purely my own amusement. I know what you mean about the work of the sysops though. My main concern is over articles like the one on Canada, where there have been numerous attempts to slag Canada. It's hard to reduce the effects though, because there are so many users who propagate American hegemony that. Look at education in Canada for example. Some user who was incapable of basic analysis of facts decided to write that the Canadian education system was inferior to American because of the percentages assigned to letter grades, and also what percentage counts as a fail. The user clearly had no concept of the fact that our education system is completely different. The remarks about grade percentages, which I have been trying to remove, would be similar to me saying that it's colder in Canada because when it's 70 degrees in Detroit, it's only 21 degrees in Windsor, ignoring that we measure temperature in Celsius, and America in Fahrenheit. Did you know that cars in Canada are way faster? The speed limit on our highways is 100! Oh, wait, that's kilometres per hour. Now, if I really didn't care about being caught for blatant parody, I might have been able to get away with typing that stuff on the Canada page. --TrueGrit 10:14, 21 December 2007 (EST)