Difference between revisions of "Talk:Underdog"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
Line 2: Line 2:
 
I've removed the sentence, "In [[atheistic]] [[Britain]], the opposite is true.  For example, a popular game show in Britain consisted of putdowns against the underdogs." I don't care who wrote it. If it's going to be in the article, it needs to at least mention WHAT gameshow it was, and preferably a source. [[User:HumanGeographer|HumanGeographer]] 21:03, 24 September 2012 (EDT)
 
I've removed the sentence, "In [[atheistic]] [[Britain]], the opposite is true.  For example, a popular game show in Britain consisted of putdowns against the underdogs." I don't care who wrote it. If it's going to be in the article, it needs to at least mention WHAT gameshow it was, and preferably a source. [[User:HumanGeographer|HumanGeographer]] 21:03, 24 September 2012 (EDT)
 
:If you don't agree with Mr. Schlafly's edits, and are not willing to put in any effort to chase down a simple citation that you seem to care so much about, perhaps you shouldn't edit his web site. [[User:MattyD|MattyD]] 21:09, 24 September 2012 (EDT)
 
:If you don't agree with Mr. Schlafly's edits, and are not willing to put in any effort to chase down a simple citation that you seem to care so much about, perhaps you shouldn't edit his web site. [[User:MattyD|MattyD]] 21:09, 24 September 2012 (EDT)
 +
::Please don't edit-war. You brought the attention to Mr. Schlafly's talk page only moments ago. Give him sufficient time to respond before you remove HIS material from HIS website. Thank you. [[User:MattyD|MattyD]] 21:17, 24 September 2012 (EDT)

Latest revision as of 01:17, September 25, 2012

Gameshow

I've removed the sentence, "In atheistic Britain, the opposite is true. For example, a popular game show in Britain consisted of putdowns against the underdogs." I don't care who wrote it. If it's going to be in the article, it needs to at least mention WHAT gameshow it was, and preferably a source. HumanGeographer 21:03, 24 September 2012 (EDT)

If you don't agree with Mr. Schlafly's edits, and are not willing to put in any effort to chase down a simple citation that you seem to care so much about, perhaps you shouldn't edit his web site. MattyD 21:09, 24 September 2012 (EDT)
Please don't edit-war. You brought the attention to Mr. Schlafly's talk page only moments ago. Give him sufficient time to respond before you remove HIS material from HIS website. Thank you. MattyD 21:17, 24 September 2012 (EDT)