Difference between revisions of "Talk:Conservative of the Year 2012"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(articles please) |
(DamianJohn's comments above are welcome, but logic and principles determine the best, like everything else on this site) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:There's no voting. It is done on the meritocratic basis, much like this site (Andy chooses). If you have constructive suggestions or comments I am sure they are welcome and will be taken into account when the final decision is made. --[[User:DamianJohn|DamianJohn]] 02:53, 25 December 2012 (EST) | :There's no voting. It is done on the meritocratic basis, much like this site (Andy chooses). If you have constructive suggestions or comments I am sure they are welcome and will be taken into account when the final decision is made. --[[User:DamianJohn|DamianJohn]] 02:53, 25 December 2012 (EST) | ||
| + | I find it troubling that some of the nominees are sufficiently prominent to make the list, but do not have a separate article in CP. Let's get to work. [[User:Wschact|Wschact]] 06:06, 25 December 2012 (EST) | ||
| − | + | :DamianJohn's comments above are welcome, but '''''logic and principles determine the best, like everything else on this site'''''. | |
Revision as of 18:31, December 25, 2012
What, if any, is the procedure for voting on this? DanAP 01:48, 25 December 2012 (EST)
- There's no voting. It is done on the meritocratic basis, much like this site (Andy chooses). If you have constructive suggestions or comments I am sure they are welcome and will be taken into account when the final decision is made. --DamianJohn 02:53, 25 December 2012 (EST)
I find it troubling that some of the nominees are sufficiently prominent to make the list, but do not have a separate article in CP. Let's get to work. Wschact 06:06, 25 December 2012 (EST)
- DamianJohn's comments above are welcome, but logic and principles determine the best, like everything else on this site.