Difference between revisions of "Talk:Conservative of the Year 2012"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(DamianJohn's comments above are welcome, but logic and principles determine the best, like everything else on this site)
(rankings)
Line 5: Line 5:
  
 
:DamianJohn's comments above are welcome, but '''''logic and principles determine the best, like everything else on this site'''''.
 
:DamianJohn's comments above are welcome, but '''''logic and principles determine the best, like everything else on this site'''''.
 +
 +
I think that Paul Ryan should probably have the top spot with Ron Paul a close second.  I don't know enough about the various international figures to assess their rankings. [[User:Wschact|Wschact]] 02:01, 27 December 2012 (EST)

Revision as of 07:01, December 27, 2012

What, if any, is the procedure for voting on this? DanAP 01:48, 25 December 2012 (EST)

There's no voting. It is done on the meritocratic basis, much like this site (Andy chooses). If you have constructive suggestions or comments I am sure they are welcome and will be taken into account when the final decision is made. --DamianJohn 02:53, 25 December 2012 (EST)

I find it troubling that some of the nominees are sufficiently prominent to make the list, but do not have a separate article in CP. Let's get to work. Wschact 06:06, 25 December 2012 (EST)

DamianJohn's comments above are welcome, but logic and principles determine the best, like everything else on this site.

I think that Paul Ryan should probably have the top spot with Ron Paul a close second. I don't know enough about the various international figures to assess their rankings. Wschact 02:01, 27 December 2012 (EST)