Difference between revisions of "Talk:Scopes Trial"
From Conservapedia
(Replaced content with "{{Wikiproject Religion}} talk:scopes trial/archive index") |
(→Page archived: Uncommondescent?) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Wikiproject Religion}} | {{Wikiproject Religion}} | ||
[[talk:scopes trial/archive index]] | [[talk:scopes trial/archive index]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | =Page archived= | ||
| + | [[User:JonM|JonM]] 22:46, 30 December 2011 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | = Uncommondescent?= | ||
| + | Quoting someone called "Uncommondescent" in the lead certainly doesn't look very encyclopedic. The tricks the lawyers played on each other is not what the trial is notable for anyway. [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] 04:15, 14 January 2014 (EST) | ||
Latest revision as of 09:15, January 14, 2014
| ! | This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to Religion-related articles on Conservapedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
Page archived
JonM 22:46, 30 December 2011 (EST)
Uncommondescent?
Quoting someone called "Uncommondescent" in the lead certainly doesn't look very encyclopedic. The tricks the lawyers played on each other is not what the trial is notable for anyway. PeterKa 04:15, 14 January 2014 (EST)