Difference between revisions of "Conservapedia:Abuse"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
#{{user|AppliedFaith}} -trolling, see [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Holocaust&diff=prev&oldid=104416][http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Heterosexuality&diff=prev&oldid=104363], "sexual activity is always impure, even when conducted within marriage." | #{{user|AppliedFaith}} -trolling, see [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Holocaust&diff=prev&oldid=104416][http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Heterosexuality&diff=prev&oldid=104363], "sexual activity is always impure, even when conducted within marriage." | ||
#{{user|Homeschool mom}} lays it on too thick - suspected parodist | #{{user|Homeschool mom}} lays it on too thick - suspected parodist | ||
| + | : Warned 4/15. Awaiting response.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 13:27, 15 April 2007 (EDT) | ||
#{{user|GofG}} useless edits - warned | #{{user|GofG}} useless edits - warned | ||
#{{user|Vyngarsson}} - 11 April 2007, trolling, see [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Resurrection&diff=prev&oldid=99990] for a good example. Another example [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=National_Rifle_Association&diff=103140&oldid=101324] | #{{user|Vyngarsson}} - 11 April 2007, trolling, see [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Resurrection&diff=prev&oldid=99990] for a good example. Another example [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=National_Rifle_Association&diff=103140&oldid=101324] | ||
Revision as of 17:27, April 15, 2007
This is where you can report abuse of editing privileges. Please make notes short and concise.
Sysops, please move notes down to 'old alerts' once the incident is closed.
Other links:
- Abuse Reporting
- Conservapedia: Vandalism alert
- Administrative Abuse
- Articles for Deletion
- Articles for Speedy Deletion
- Conservapedia Panel
Current Alerts
- ILikeCookies (talk • contribs • count) - not so much abusive edits as just plain fluff--doesn't quite seem appropriate. What does everybody think?
- Hamtandrus (talk • contribs • count) -self identified Holocaust denier. [1]
- I think he's just being facetious.--Elamdri 00:37, 14 April 2007 (EDT)
- He also says that he's 'done with this - place' Wikinterpreter
- I think he's just being facetious.--Elamdri 00:37, 14 April 2007 (EDT)
- Save Our Values (talk • contribs • count)
- The 6 random hex digit sock perp is back: http://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Log/newusers Myk 13:46, 13 April 2007 (EDT)
- AppliedFaith (talk • contribs • count) -trolling, see [2][3], "sexual activity is always impure, even when conducted within marriage."
- Homeschool mom (talk • contribs • count) lays it on too thick - suspected parodist
- Warned 4/15. Awaiting response.--Aschlafly 13:27, 15 April 2007 (EDT)
- GofG (talk • contribs • count) useless edits - warned
- Vyngarsson (talk • contribs • count) - 11 April 2007, trolling, see [4] for a good example. Another example [5]
- Phiattiangel (talk • contribs • count) - 11 April 2007, trolling.
Dealt with
- User:AnonymousLegion - Vandalism--Epicurius 14:59, 4 April 2007 (EDT) --Blocked by --Elamdri 18:44, 5 April 2007 (EDT)
- User:Mjc12 - blocked by Conservative
- Polarbear (talk • contribs • count) - Please check authenticity of comments and contribs---Blocked by Elamdri 00:01, 8 April 2007 (EDT)
- TK blocked Cheney123 (contribs) (infinite, account creation blocked) (Vandalism: "Democrats" )
- User:Theelephant - Vandalism--Epicurius 18:09, 4 April 2007 (EDT)
- 18:09, 4 April 2007 Tsumetai blocked Theelephant (contribs) with an expiry time of infinite (obscenity)
- Cooperstown4 (talk • contribs • count) - 9 April 2007, TK blocked Cooperstown4 (infinite, account creation blocked) (Vandal/Nonsense/Insults)
- Zac4213 (talk • contribs • count) - Was my block too hasty?
- Jaques (talk • contribs • count)- Many recent edits very similar to Wikipedia and use exact same pictures, See Whale and Plankton.
- Jaques is a frequent contributor and many of his entries are good. The complaint would have to be more specific than this. There is nothing wrong about copying public domain pictures, for example.--Aschlafly 13:23, 15 April 2007 (EDT)
- Mandolin2k (talk • contribs • count) - Joke entry (see "Jellystone")
- Godblessamerica (talk • contribs • count) - Copying from Wikipedia, prank edit here: [6]