Difference between revisions of "Talk:Dumbarton"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(New page: Bad idea. To be consistent we would have to merge Greenock and Inverclyde with the Firth of Clyde as well. And the various and assorted places like Musselburgh, Cockenzie, ...)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Bad idea. To be consistent we would have to merge [[Greenock]] and [[Inverclyde]] with the Firth of Clyde as well. And the various and assorted places like [[Musselburgh]], [[Cockenzie]], [[North Berwick]] etc. etc. with the [[Firth of Forth]]. And [[Kingston upon Hull]] and [[Goole]] with the [[River Humber]]. [[User:AlanE|AlanE]] 16:49, 6 January 2009 (EST)
 
Bad idea. To be consistent we would have to merge [[Greenock]] and [[Inverclyde]] with the Firth of Clyde as well. And the various and assorted places like [[Musselburgh]], [[Cockenzie]], [[North Berwick]] etc. etc. with the [[Firth of Forth]]. And [[Kingston upon Hull]] and [[Goole]] with the [[River Humber]]. [[User:AlanE|AlanE]] 16:49, 6 January 2009 (EST)
 +
 +
Thanks Cons. [[User:AlanE|AlanE]] 23:03, 8 September 2014 (EDT)

Revision as of 03:03, September 9, 2014

Bad idea. To be consistent we would have to merge Greenock and Inverclyde with the Firth of Clyde as well. And the various and assorted places like Musselburgh, Cockenzie, North Berwick etc. etc. with the Firth of Forth. And Kingston upon Hull and Goole with the River Humber. AlanE 16:49, 6 January 2009 (EST)

Thanks Cons. AlanE 23:03, 8 September 2014 (EDT)