Difference between revisions of "Third way of evolution"
Conservative (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Many evolutionary biologists are very dissatisfied with the Modern Evolutionary Synthesis (also known as Neo-Darwinism (see: A group of evolutionary biologist who are dissatisf...") |
Conservative (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
There is a need for a more open “third way” of discussing evolutionary change based on empirical observations.<ref>[http://www.thethirdwayofevolution.com/ Third Way website]</ref>}} | There is a need for a more open “third way” of discussing evolutionary change based on empirical observations.<ref>[http://www.thethirdwayofevolution.com/ Third Way website]</ref>}} | ||
| + | |||
| + | == See also == | ||
| + | |||
| + | *[[Theories of evolution: Schools of evolutionary thought]] | ||
[[Category: Evolution]] | [[Category: Evolution]] | ||
Revision as of 06:11, September 23, 2014
Many evolutionary biologists are very dissatisfied with the Modern Evolutionary Synthesis (also known as Neo-Darwinism (see:
A group of evolutionary biologist who are dissatisfied with the Modern evolutionary synthesis school of evolutionary thought have formed a "third way" school of evolutionary thought which they describe as follows: The DNA record does not support the assertion that small random mutations are the main source of new and useful variations...
Many see evolution as a complex process with distinct mechanisms and stages rather than a phenomenon explainable by a small number of principles. The divergences and multiplicity of ideas, opinions and theories on this website are necessary since many fields of evolutionary biology remain relatively unexplored...
There is a need for a more open “third way” of discussing evolutionary change based on empirical observations.[1]}}