Difference between revisions of "Third way of evolution"
Conservative (talk | contribs) |
Conservative (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
A group such evolutionary biologists from prominent public universities have formed a "third way" school of evolutionary thought which they describe as follows: | A group such evolutionary biologists from prominent public universities have formed a "third way" school of evolutionary thought which they describe as follows: | ||
| − | The [[DNA]] record does not support the assertion that small random mutations are the main source of new and useful variations... | + | {{cquote|The [[DNA]] record does not support the assertion that small random mutations are the main source of new and useful variations... |
Many see evolution as a complex process with distinct mechanisms and stages rather than a phenomenon explainable by a small number of principles. The divergences and multiplicity of ideas, opinions and theories on this website are necessary since many fields of evolutionary biology remain relatively unexplored... | Many see evolution as a complex process with distinct mechanisms and stages rather than a phenomenon explainable by a small number of principles. The divergences and multiplicity of ideas, opinions and theories on this website are necessary since many fields of evolutionary biology remain relatively unexplored... | ||
Revision as of 06:21, September 23, 2014
Many evolutionary biologists are very dissatisfied with the modern evolutionary synthesis which is also known as Neo-Darwinism (see: Recent clamour to revise the modern evolutionary synthesis), but they refuse to accept biblical creation.
A group such evolutionary biologists from prominent public universities have formed a "third way" school of evolutionary thought which they describe as follows:
| “ | The DNA record does not support the assertion that small random mutations are the main source of new and useful variations...
Many see evolution as a complex process with distinct mechanisms and stages rather than a phenomenon explainable by a small number of principles. The divergences and multiplicity of ideas, opinions and theories on this website are necessary since many fields of evolutionary biology remain relatively unexplored... There is a need for a more open “third way” of discussing evolutionary change based on empirical observations.[1] |
” |