Difference between revisions of "Conservapedia:Abuse"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎Current Alerts: user|SRogers)
Line 16: Line 16:
  
 
==Current Alerts==
 
==Current Alerts==
 +
 
#{{user|SRogers}} - anti-Semitism; see piped link Judaism|bankers in Federal Reserve article, for example [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Federal_Reserve&diff=90085&oldid=81656]
 
#{{user|SRogers}} - anti-Semitism; see piped link Judaism|bankers in Federal Reserve article, for example [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Federal_Reserve&diff=90085&oldid=81656]
 
#{{user|ILikeCookies}} - not so much abusive edits as just plain fluff--doesn't quite seem appropriate. What does everybody think?
 
#{{user|ILikeCookies}} - not so much abusive edits as just plain fluff--doesn't quite seem appropriate. What does everybody think?
Line 27: Line 28:
 
#{{user|Vyngarsson}} - 11 April 2007, trolling, see [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Resurrection&diff=prev&oldid=99990] for a good example.  Another example [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=National_Rifle_Association&diff=103140&oldid=101324]
 
#{{user|Vyngarsson}} - 11 April 2007, trolling, see [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Resurrection&diff=prev&oldid=99990] for a good example.  Another example [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=National_Rifle_Association&diff=103140&oldid=101324]
 
#{{user|Phiattiangel}} - 11 April 2007, trolling.
 
#{{user|Phiattiangel}} - 11 April 2007, trolling.
−
#{{user|Aschlafly}} is regularly making postings of questionable truth and verifiability in violation of  [[Conservapedia:Commandments|Commandment]] No. 1. Although sources are given ([[Conservapedia:Commandments|Commandment]] No. 2) they often have no relevance to the claims made. As a result of ignoring the above [[Conservapedia:Commandments|commandments]]  many edits contain personal opinion and violate [[Conservapedia:Commandments|Commandment]] No.5. These violations have been pointed out on talk pages but are frequently ignored. <sub>This unsigned message was left by:</sub> [[User:WhatIsG0ing0n|WhatIsG0ing0n]]
 
 
===Dealt with===
 
===Dealt with===
  

Revision as of 19:28, April 16, 2007

This is where you can report abuse of editing privileges. Please make notes short and concise.

Sysops, please move notes down to 'old alerts' once the incident is closed.

Archives: 1 2 3

Other links:


Current Alerts

  1. SRogers (talk • contribs • count) - anti-Semitism; see piped link Judaism|bankers in Federal Reserve article, for example [1]
  2. ILikeCookies (talk • contribs • count) - not so much abusive edits as just plain fluff--doesn't quite seem appropriate. What does everybody think?
  3. Save Our Values (talk • contribs • count)
  4. The 6 random hex digit sock perp is back: http://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Log/newusers Myk 13:46, 13 April 2007 (EDT)
  5. AppliedFaith (talk • contribs • count) -trolling, see [2][3], "sexual activity is always impure, even when conducted within marriage."
  6. Homeschool mom (talk • contribs • count) lays it on too thick - suspected parodist
Warned 4/15. Awaiting response.--Aschlafly 13:27, 15 April 2007 (EDT)
No response. Another user said that her edits are copies from Wikipedia. Looks like we may have to block. Give her another day to respond?--Aschlafly 20:46, 15 April 2007 (EDT)
  1. GofG (talk • contribs • count) useless edits - warned
  2. Vyngarsson (talk • contribs • count) - 11 April 2007, trolling, see [4] for a good example. Another example [5]
  3. Phiattiangel (talk • contribs • count) - 11 April 2007, trolling.

Dealt with

  1. User:AnonymousLegion - Vandalism--Epicurius 14:59, 4 April 2007 (EDT) --Blocked by --Elamdri 18:44, 5 April 2007 (EDT)
  2. User:Mjc12 - blocked by Conservative
  3. Polarbear (talk • contribs • count) - Please check authenticity of comments and contribs---Blocked by Elamdri 00:01, 8 April 2007 (EDT)
  4. TK blocked Cheney123 (contribs) (infinite, account creation blocked) (Vandalism: "Democrats" )
  5. User:Theelephant - Vandalism--Epicurius 18:09, 4 April 2007 (EDT)
    • 18:09, 4 April 2007 Tsumetai blocked Theelephant (contribs) with an expiry time of infinite (obscenity)
  6. Cooperstown4 (talk • contribs • count) - 9 April 2007, TK blocked Cooperstown4 (infinite, account creation blocked) (Vandal/Nonsense/Insults)
  7. Zac4213 (talk • contribs • count) - Was my block too hasty?
  8. Jaques (talk • contribs • count)- Many recent edits very similar to Wikipedia and use exact same pictures, See Whale and Plankton.
Jaques is a frequent contributor and many of his entries are good. The complaint would have to be more specific than this. There is nothing wrong about copying public domain pictures, for example.--Aschlafly 13:23, 15 April 2007 (EDT)
  1. Mandolin2k (talk • contribs • count) - Joke entry (see "Jellystone")
  2. Godblessamerica (talk • contribs • count) - Copying from Wikipedia, prank edit here: [6]
  3. Hamtandrus (talk • contribs • count) -self identified Holocaust denier. [7]
I think he's just being facetious.--Elamdri 00:37, 14 April 2007 (EDT)
He also says that he's 'done with this - place' Wikinterpreter
No block Holocaust denial isn't against the rules. Geo.Talk 18:39, 15 April 2007 (EDT)