Difference between revisions of "Talk:Essay: How to choose a Bible"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(appreciative response) |
(note that I placed a "caveat") |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
::Thanks, DonnyC. Most appreciated. Glad to help. | ::Thanks, DonnyC. Most appreciated. Glad to help. | ||
::Conservative, I ''heartily'' agree with you re Berkeley! The end list of helps articles listed as offered by Conservapedia will clarify that for the reader, if they do their reading. However, a parenthetical inline comment, not a footnote, such as "(considered a source of poor Biblical scholarship by most researchers)", would be most welcome! Balance is one thing, but truthfulness and accuracy is always revealing. Feel free to make insertions as needed. Appreciate your cogent observation (and ''thank you'' for the Redirect.). <br/>(''As soon as I finish proofreading the rest of the Apocrypha/Deuterocanonical articles, I will start again on the 4 remaining articles you requested I improve/create.'') <br/>'''''Semper Fi!''''' --[[User:Dataclarifier|Dataclarifier]] 02:55, 16 January 2015 (EST) | ::Conservative, I ''heartily'' agree with you re Berkeley! The end list of helps articles listed as offered by Conservapedia will clarify that for the reader, if they do their reading. However, a parenthetical inline comment, not a footnote, such as "(considered a source of poor Biblical scholarship by most researchers)", would be most welcome! Balance is one thing, but truthfulness and accuracy is always revealing. Feel free to make insertions as needed. Appreciate your cogent observation (and ''thank you'' for the Redirect.). <br/>(''As soon as I finish proofreading the rest of the Apocrypha/Deuterocanonical articles, I will start again on the 4 remaining articles you requested I improve/create.'') <br/>'''''Semper Fi!''''' --[[User:Dataclarifier|Dataclarifier]] 02:55, 16 January 2015 (EST) | ||
| + | :::I placed a ''caveat'' above the list of critical studies sources. --[[User:Dataclarifier|Dataclarifier]] 10:50, 16 January 2015 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 15:50, January 16, 2015
If I am not mistaken, I think some of these sources like Berkeley, etc are theological liberals and do a poor job. They tend to take a low view of Scripture. Conservative 20:26, 15 January 2015 (EST)
- I think this is a great article Dataclarifier. Definitely a useful resource. --DonnyC 22:35, 15 January 2015 (EST)
- Thanks, DonnyC. Most appreciated. Glad to help.
- Conservative, I heartily agree with you re Berkeley! The end list of helps articles listed as offered by Conservapedia will clarify that for the reader, if they do their reading. However, a parenthetical inline comment, not a footnote, such as "(considered a source of poor Biblical scholarship by most researchers)", would be most welcome! Balance is one thing, but truthfulness and accuracy is always revealing. Feel free to make insertions as needed. Appreciate your cogent observation (and thank you for the Redirect.).
(As soon as I finish proofreading the rest of the Apocrypha/Deuterocanonical articles, I will start again on the 4 remaining articles you requested I improve/create.)
Semper Fi! --Dataclarifier 02:55, 16 January 2015 (EST)- I placed a caveat above the list of critical studies sources. --Dataclarifier 10:50, 16 January 2015 (EST)