User talk:TheAmericanRedoubt

Christian Conservatives

Be strong, be of good courage, God Bless America, Long live the Republic. God speed to everyone who accesses this page!

Second Amendment-supporting American citizens gifted their firearms to gun free zone-gun control supporting British citizens during World War II via The American Committee for the Defense of British Homes

Sources for Public Domain Pictures

I post this since I hope to soon be uploading several hundred Category:Firearms, Category:Pro Second Amendment, and Category:Survivalism photos to enhance the SEO visibility of numerous new articles I will be creating in these categories. TheAmericanRedoubt 11:57, 17 January 2015 (EST)

Public Domain pictures and pictures with generous copyright provisions

Flikr and Creative Commons:

• http://www.flickr.com/creativecommons/
• http://www.askdavetaylor.com/how_to_identify_public_domain_creative_commons_photos_flickr.html
• http://www.sxc.hu/

Some other good sites for public domain images:

• http://www.pdphoto.org
• http://digital.nypl.org/mmpco/index.cfm
• http://karenswhimsy.com/public-domain-images/
• NASA and USGS photos are also in the public domain
• http://teachpol.tcnj.edu/amer_pol_hist/_use.htm

Source: Thanks to User:Conservative/sandboxfile

---

Comments

In general, please keep your comments to a specific Talk Page about a specific article. Thank you. TheAmericanRedoubt 22:27, 10 February 2015 (EST)

---

Wiki policy

The Conservapedia Style Guide has a policy (If it does not have this policy, I will create it after I do this edit) of one link to a particular article at Wikipedia within a given article.

For example, a gun related article can only have one link to Conservapedia's gun control article.

Why is this policy important?

Failure to follow this policy creates difficult to read link rich articles which are unappealing to the eye. And once your article is unappealing to the eye, people will quickly click off it. So a link rich article is self-defeating in terms of getting people to dig more deeply into a subject at a wiki. Furthermore, it will cause people to leave the website sooner rather than later.

In addition, most people judge a book by its cover. An unappealing looking article is assumed to be an inferior article by most people.

I removed about a dozen duplicate internal links from this article: Ammunition control. It looks better now, but it still needs much improvement as far as being too link rich. Please remove the duplicate links. For example, each state mentioned in the article (New Tork, California, etc.), should only have one link to its respective article at this wiki. Conservative 02:12, 14 February 2015 (EST)

The policy I am referring to is located at Internal link policy. Please take the time to read Conservapedia's Manual of Style.

I hope this message to you is helpful. I would hate for you to lose the opportunity of gaining a loyal audience due to something that is easily unavoidable.

Please go through your key articles (your most important articles) and remove the link richness. You can remove the link richness in the other articles as you continue to edit them. Conservative 02:21, 14 February 2015 (EST)