Talk:National Health Service

This should be a disambiguation page, because NHS can also refer to National Honor Society. It doesn't make sense that a British health service should take precedence over that on Conservapedia. MountainDew 17:21, 12 March 2007 (EDT)

Add a disambiguation page then!(The beauty of the wiki software ey ;-))MatteeNeutra 17:22, 12 March 2007 (EDT)

It doesn't make sense that one of the largest employers in the world and perhaps the most significant example of a socialised health system (entirely relevant to conservatives one would think) should take precedence over the "National Honor Society", whatever that is? Priceless. Mralph72 08:28, 5 May 2007 (EDT)

"One of the largest employers in the world"? Now there's a claim to fame. The NHS is behind the ... Chinese Army. I guess we need a special entry about that communist entity now too, due to its having so many employees??--Aschlafly 08:31, 5 May 2007 (EDT)

Well, it might not be a bad idea actually. Just because it's communist (or at least a curious hybrid of unbridled capitalism, corruption and state control) doesn't mean that we should ignore it.

Exactly, are these people trying to create an encyclopaedia about the real world, or the one they want to live in? Wait, it seems Aschlafly created the Chinese Army article! Was he trolling or was what he said just badly worded? I'm confused. Anyway, unless someone wants to make an article on this Honor thing, it would make much more sense to move the National Health Service article back here, adding a line at the top about its other meaning. EmanresU 15:21, 12 July 2007 (EDT)

Is this serious!? How can you possibly compare the NHS, an institution that actually saves lives (and yes, I know it is not perfect, but what system is?), and the Chinese military!? It is ridiculous. Though I am proud that the NHS is so large. I have only positive experiences of the NHS and I hope it exists far into the futureLiberalnproud

They were comparing the number of employees. What's rediculous about that? HelpJazz 21:37, 14 November 2008 (EST)

This is one of the most retarded articles I have ever read. I mean, I know it's going to have a conservative slant, but seriously?

The NHS is continuously rated on of the top health systems in the world... DasBeta 17:27, 15 February 2015 (EST)

DasBeta, no offense intended, but I have seen a lot of leftist lie at Conservapedia so I can't take what people claim at face value without sufficient evidence being provided. I also recall various scandals being reported about the NHS in recent years. So please provide evidence for your claim. Furthermore, the Conserpvapedia commandments indicate that claims be supported in articles.Conservative 17:42, 15 February 2015 (EST)

Here is one report on it: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/uks-healthcare-ranked-the-best-out-of-11-western-countries-with-us-coming-last-9542833.html http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/health/news/8877412/NHS-among-best-health-care-systems-in-the-world.html And here are some other statistics: http://www.bloomberg.com/visual-data/best-and-worst//most-efficient-health-care-2014-countries

Indeed there have been scandals involving the NHS, but overall it continues to be well received by the general public, nearly half would want to pay more taxes for it. http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/britain-prepared-to-pay-more-tax-to-support-the-nhs-poll-finds-9574384.html DasBeta 18:43, 15 February 2015 (EST)